S'abonner

The first 15 years of the American Academy of Dermatology skin cancer screening programs: 1985-1999 - 29/08/11

Doi : 10.1067/mjd.2003.9 
Alan C. Geller, RN, MPHa,b, Zi Zhang, MB, MPHf, Arthur J. Sober, MDc, Allan C. Halpern, MD, MSd, Martin A. Weinstock, MD, PhDe, Simone Daniels, MPHa, Donald R. Miller, ScDa, Marie-France Demierre, MD, FRCPCa, Daniel R. Brooks, ScD, MPHb, Barbara A. Gilchrest, MDa
Boston, Massachusetts, New York, New York, and Providence, Rhode Island 
From the Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine,a The Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health,b Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston,c Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City,d Brown University, Department of Dermatology and Dermatoepidemiology Unit, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center,e and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health.f 

Abstract

Background: In response to the precipitous increase of melanoma, the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) has coupled melanoma/skin cancer education with free skin cancer screening programs throughout the United States since 1985. The purpose of this analysis is to investigate the risk factors, access to dermatologic services, and screening results of participants in AAD-sponsored programs during the first 15 years that this service was available to the US public. Methods: Before screening, participants completed a standardized AAD screening form. Screening forms were counted in the AAD central office and recorded in annual summaries. Forms were sent for keypunching and returned to the AAD on a computer disk annually. In 1999, disks were sent to Boston University and a master file was created. Results: Computerized records were available for 819,019 screening forms and 639,835 individuals. In all, 65% of screenees had at least 1 risk factor and 33% had at least 2 risk factors. Of screenees, 33% reported a changing mole and 37% had skin type I or II. Among all screenees, nearly 80% did not have a regular dermatologist, 78% reported no prior AAD skin cancer screening, 60% had never had their skin checked by any doctor, and 51% would not have seen a doctor for skin cancer without the free screening. Nearly 30% of screenees had a presumptive diagnosis of skin cancer or a precursor lesion. Melanomas confirmed by postscreening biopsy were more likely than those in population-based registries to be less than 1.50 mm in thickness. Conclusions: AAD national screening and educational programs have expanded to all 50 states, provided educational messages about sun protection and early detection to millions, and served many US citizens with an above average risk for skin cancer and suboptimal access to dermatologic care. Screenees had a disturbingly high point prevalence of malignant and premalignant skin lesions. Sustained commitment by the AAD leadership and membership to the screening program is critical to reducing the morbidity and mortality of skin cancer. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;48:34-41.)

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 This analysis was funded by an unrestricted grant from the Galderma Corporation to the American Academy of Dermatology through a competitive contract mechanism.
 Reprint requests: Alan C. Geller, RN, MPH, Boston University School of Medicine, 720 Harrison Ave, DOB 801A, Boston MA 02118. E-mail: ageller@bu.edu.


© 2003  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 48 - N° 1

P. 34-41 - janvier 2003 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Schamberg's purpura in children: A review of 13 cases
  • Antonio Torrelo, Celia Requena, Imelda G. Mediero, Antonio Zambrano
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Clinical and pathologic features of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy: A report of two cases
  • Brian N. Streams, Vincent Liu, Nanette Liégeois, Samuel M. Moschella

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.