S'abonner

Cost of atopic dermatitis and eczema in the United States - 01/09/11

Doi : 10.1067/mjd.2002.120528 
Charles N. Ellis, MDa, Lynn A. Drake, MDb, Mary M. Prendergast, MBAc, William Abramovits, MDd, Mark Boguniewicz, MDe, C.Ralph Daniel, MDf, Mark Lebwohl, MDg, Seth R. Stevens, MDh, Diane L. Whitaker-Worth, MDi, J.Wang Cheng, BAj, Kuo B. Tong, MSj
Ann Arbor, Michigan; Boston, Massachusetts; Deerfield, Illinois; Dallas, Texas; Denver, Colorado; Jackson, Mississippi; New York, New York; Cleveland, Ohio; Farmington, Connecticut; and San Francisco, California 
From the Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbora; Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Bostonb; Fujisawa Healthcare, Inc, Deerfieldc; Baylor University Medical Center and University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallasd; National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denvere; University of Mississippi, Jacksonf; The Mount Sinai School of Medicine of New York University, New Yorkg; University Hospital of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve Universityh; University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmingtoni; and Quorum Consulting, Inc, San Francisco.j 

Abstract

Background: Atopic dermatitis/eczema (AD/E) is a common disease. Few studies have attempted to quantify the cost to third-party payers. Objective: Our purpose was to identify the annual cost of medical services and prescription drugs for the treatment of AD/E to private insurance and Medicaid payers in the United States. Methods: We used a retrospective study design employing claims data from 1997 and 1998 from a private insurer and a state Medicaid program to analyze costs incurred. Beneficiaries were considered to have AD/E if they had at least one claim in 1997 with a primary or secondary listing of 1 of 3 diagnosis codes: 691.8, other atopic dermatitis and related conditions; 692.9, contact dermatitis and other eczema when no cause is specified; or 373.3, noninfectious dermatoses of eyelid. Patients who did not meet the diagnosis criteria served as a control group in each payer for comparisons of expenditures with the AD/E group. Results: Disease prevalence was 2.4% (private insurer) to 2.6% (Medicaid) of all eligible beneficiaries, and 3.5% to 4.1% of patients submitted at least one health care claim during the study period. Medicaid-insured patients used outpatient hospital visits and hospitalizations at a greater rate than did privately insured patients; neither used emergency departments extensively. The third-party payer cost of illness for AD/E ranged from $0.9 billion to $3.8 billion when projected across the total number of persons younger than 65 years insured by private insurers and Medicaid in the United States. More than one fourth of all health care costs for patients with AD/E may be attributed to AD/E and co-morbid conditions. Conclusions: Annual costs of AD/E are similar to those of other diseases such as emphysema, psoriasis, and epilepsy. Patients incur significant costs associated with AD/E and co-morbid conditions. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;46:361-70.)

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abbreviations : AD/E, CI, ICD-9-CM


Plan


 Funding source: Fujisawa Healthcare, Inc. All physician authors were compensated for their time serving on the advisory board for this work.
 Disclosure: Ms Prendergast is an employee of Fujisawa Healthcare, Inc. Drs Ellis and Lebwohl and Messrs Cheng and Tong are consultants for Fujisawa Healthcare, Inc.
 Reprint requests: Charles N. Ellis, MD, Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0314.


© 2002  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 46 - N° 3

P. 361-370 - mars 2002 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Practical evaluation and management of cutaneous lymphoma
  • Maxwell A. Fung, Michael J. Murphy, Diane M. Hoss, Jane M. Grant-Kels
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Reactivity to trichophytin antigen in patients with onychomycosis: Effect of terbinafine
  • Boni E. Elewski, Maria El Charif, Kevin D. Cooper, Mahmoud Ghannoum, Jay E. Birnbaum

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.