Access to the text (HTML) Access to the text (HTML)
PDF Access to the PDF text
Service d'aide à la décision clinique

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription.
  • If you are a subscriber, please sign in 'My Account' at the top right of the screen.

  • If you want to subscribe to this journal, see our rates

  • You can purchase this item in Pay Per ViewPay per View - FAQ : 30,00 € Taxes included to order
    Pages Iconography Videos Other
    3 0 0 0

Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité
Volume 35, n° 3
pages 269-271 (mars 2007)
Doi : 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2007.01.008
Contre la césarienne en prévention de l'incontinence anale
Arguments against cesarean section to prevent anal incontinence

O. Dupuis
Service de gynécologie-obstétrique (Professeur-P.-Gaucherand), centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud (HCL), université Claude-Bernard-Lyon, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France 

Mots clés : Accouchement, Césarienne, Incontinence anale, Échographie endo-anale, Sphincter anal, Nerf pudendal

Keywords : Delivery, Cesarean section, Anal incontinence, Endoanal ultrasound, Anal sphincter, Pudendal nerve

© 2007  Elsevier Masson SAS. All Rights Reserved.
EM-CONSULTE.COM is registrered at the CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.
As per the Law relating to information storage and personal integrity, you have the right to oppose (art 26 of that law), access (art 34 of that law) and rectify (art 36 of that law) your personal data. You may thus request that your data, should it be inaccurate, incomplete, unclear, outdated, not be used or stored, be corrected, clarified, updated or deleted.
Personal information regarding our website's visitors, including their identity, is confidential.
The owners of this website hereby guarantee to respect the legal confidentiality conditions, applicable in France, and not to disclose this data to third parties.
Article Outline
You can move this window by clicking on the headline