S'abonner

Patients' opinions regarding direct access to dermatologic specialty care - 11/09/11

Doi : 10.1016/S0190-9622(97)70290-1 
Sylvia A. Owen, BAa, Edgar Maeyens, MDb, Peyton E. Weary, MDc

From the Duke University School of Medicine, Durham,a private practice in dermatology, Coos Bay,b and the Department of Dermatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.c

Durham, North Carolina, Coos Bay, Oregon, and Charlottesville, Virginia 

Abstract

Many factors such as cost have been used by managed care systems to limit patient access to specialty care, including dermatology. To date, however, patients' opinions regarding these decisions have not been analyzed. The purpose of the study was to survey patient opinions regarding the efficacy, costs, and desirability of gatekeeper-mediated versus direct access to dermatologic specialty care. One hundred fifteen of 150 consecutive patients who were seen in an outpatient dermatology clinic completed an anonymous survey concerning their current visit. They were asked about referral to the dermatologist by other physicians, number of prior physician visits, and efficacy of therapies received. Patients rated their level of satisfaction with generalist versus specialist care for their condition and evaluated the importance of direct access to dermatologic specialty care. Thirty-nine percent of respondents (42 of 108) were on their first visit to the dermatologist for their current condition. One half of respondents (57 of 115) had previously seen another physician for this condition. Thirty percent (34 of 115) had been referred to the dermatologist by another physician, most often a family practitioner or internist. Two thirds (38 of 57) of those seen by a previous physician had received therapy from that physician, but only one third (12 of 35) believed it to have been of any benefit. Twenty-three percent (11 of 47) claimed to have incurred more than five visits to the other physician before seeing the dermatologist. Twenty-four percent of patients (12 of 50) were "very satisfied" with the previous physician's care compared with 89% (100 of 112) with the dermatologist's care. Only 6% of respondents (7 of 122) believed a generalist could adequately treat their skin disease. Eighty-seven percent (100 of 115) described direct access to dermatology as being "very important" to their health care. The results of this study suggest that many patients may prefer dermatologic specialists over generalists as primary caregivers for diseases of the skin. They may favor direct access to dermatologic specialty care for its efficacy and for cost and time savings. (J Am Acad Dermatol 1997;36:250-6.)

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Reprint requests: Edgar Maeyens, Jr., MD, 375 Park Ave., Suite 5, Coos Bay, OR 97420.
 0190-9622/97/$5.00 + 0 16/1/76717


© 1997  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 36 - N° 2

P. 250-256 - février 1997 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Insect repellents: An overview
  • Margaret Brown, Adelaide A. Hebert, From the Departments of Dermatologya and Pediatrics,b The University of Texas Medical School at Houston.
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Surgical Pearl: Preparing the defect for an island pedicle flap
  • Clark C. Otley, Randall K. Roenigk, From the Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic.

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.