S'abonner

A survey of dermatology resident education in cosmetic procedures - 13/01/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.05.010 
Joslyn S. Kirby, MD a, , Cheri N. Adgerson, MD b, Bryan E. Anderson, MD a
a Department of Dermatology, Milton S. Hershey Penn State Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 
b Department of Dermatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 

Reprint requests: Joslyn S. Kirby, MD, Department of Dermatology, Milton S. Hershey Penn State Medical Center, 500 University Dr, Mail Code HU14, Hershey, PA 17033.

Abstract

Background

The demands for cosmetic procedures are increasing. Dermatologists perform many of these procedures, therefore adequate education and training during residency is important. Surveys demonstrate dermatology residents desire more training even while faculty members believe this has already become a more prominent feature of resident education.

Objective

We sought to assess the time and methods dedicated to education and training of cosmetic procedures in dermatology residency.

Methods

A 26-question survey was developed and electronically distributed in May 2010 to dermatology program directors via the Association of Professors of Dermatology list-serve with their approval. Program directors were asked to forward the e-mail to their instructors of cosmetic/procedural dermatology, and chief residents. Responses were anonymous.

Results

A total of 86 responses were collected. In all, 67% (n = 54) of respondents had formal lectures focusing on cosmetic dermatology. Lecture topics reported by more than 50% of respondents included botulinum toxin injection, lasers, soft tissue augmentation, chemical peels, and sclerotherapy. Topics such as dermabrasion, liposuction, and scar revision were less commonly taught. The most commonly encountered and performed procedures were botulinum toxin injection and lasers (100%, n = 86); 98.8% (n = 85) encounter soft tissue augmentation and 95.4% (n = 82) encounter both chemical peels and sclerotherapy. Resident experience performing procedures as the first assistant or as the first surgeon varied widely.

Limitations

The limitations of this study are that the data were subjectively reported so results may differ from the true amount of time spent in any activity. The data may be biased by the population that responded as they may have strong opinions supporting or opposing training in cosmetic procedures. The data also may have been skewed by the small percentage of participants who were instructors of cosmetic dermatology (21%), chief residents (20%), and others respondents (8% total).

Conclusion

The results demonstrate the variability of training in cosmetic procedures. The challenge for programs is to find the balance between insufficiency and overemphasis. The results of this study will hopefully assist programs in determining the quantity and methods of resident training in cosmetic procedures.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : botulinum toxin, cosmetic dermatology, education, lasers, lecture, liposuction, observation, perform, procedural dermatology, residency, sclerotherapy, survey, training


Plan


 Funding sources: None.
 Conflicts of interest: None declared.


© 2011  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 68 - N° 2

P. e23-e28 - février 2013 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Saurian papulosis: A new clinicopathological entity
  • Ana María Molina-Ruiz, María del Carmen Fariña, Loreto Carrasco, Carlos Santonja, José Luis Rodríguez-Peralto, Antonio Torrelo, Heinz Kutzner, Luis Requena
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Prognostic value of histologic features of toxic epidermal necrolysis
  • Laurence Valeyrie-Allanore, Sylvie Bastuji-Garin, Sarah Guégan, Nicolas Ortonne, Martine Bagot, Jean-Claude Roujeau, Jean E. Revuz, Janine Wechsler, Pierre Wolkenstein

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.