Article

2 Iconography
Access to the text (HTML) Access to the text (HTML)
PDF Access to the PDF text
Advertising


Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription.
  • If you are a subscriber, please sign in 'My Account' at the top right of the screen.

  • If you want to subscribe to this journal, see our rates



Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 62, n° 6
pages 929.e1-929.e9 (juin 2010)
Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.07.028
accepted : 21 July 2009
Original Articles

Estimated equivalency of vitamin D production from natural sun exposure versus oral vitamin D supplementation across seasons at two US latitudes
 

Vitaly Terushkin, BS a, , Anna Bender, MD a, , Estee L. Psaty, BA a, Ola Engelsen, PhD b, Steven Q. Wang, MD a, , Allan C. Halpern, MD a
a Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 
b Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Tromsø, Norway 

Reprint requests: Steven Q. Wang, MD, Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 160 E 53 St, New York, NY 10022.

See commentary on page 935

Abstract
Background

The relationship between oral vitamin D supplementation and cutaneous photosynthesis is not well understood.

Objective

We sought to provide estimates of the equivalency of vitamin D production from natural sun exposure versus oral supplementation.

Methods

Using the FastRT simulation tool, we determined sun exposure times needed to achieve serum vitamin D3 concentrations equivalent to 400 or 1000 IU vitamin D for individuals of various Fitzpatrick skin types living in Miami, FL, and Boston, MA, during the months of January, April, July, and October.

Results

Peak ultraviolet B irradiation for vitamin D synthesis occurs around 12 pm Eastern Standard Time (EST). In Boston, MA, from April to October at 12 pm EST an individual with type III skin, with 25.5% of the body surface area exposed, would need to spend 3 to 8 minutes in the sun to synthesize 400 IU of vitamin D. It is difficult to synthesize vitamin D during the winter in Boston, MA. For all study months in Miami, FL, an individual with type III skin would need to spend 3 to 6 minutes at 12 pm EST to synthesize 400 IU. Vitamin D synthesis occurs faster in individuals with lighter Fitzpatrick skin types. The duration to attain 1000 IU of vitamin D is longer in all scenarios.

Limitations

Results of the computer model are only approximations. In addition, calculations were made based on the assumption that ¼ of 1 minimal erythema dose directed at ¼ body surface area is equal to 1000 IU of oral vitamin D.

Conclusions

Although it may be tempting to recommend intentional sun exposure based on our findings, it is difficult, if not impossible to titrate one’s exposure. There are well-known detrimental side effects of ultraviolet irradiation. Therefore, oral supplementation remains the safest way for increasing vitamin D status.

The full text of this article is available in PDF format.

Key words : oral supplementation, ultraviolet irradiation, vitamin D synthesis

Abbreviations used : BSA, EST, IARC, MED, SDD, UV



 Funding sources: None.
 Conflicts of interest: None declared.

  These two authors have equal responsibility for the work described herein.


© 2009  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.@@#104156@@
EM-CONSULTE.COM is registrered at the CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.
As per the Law relating to information storage and personal integrity, you have the right to oppose (art 26 of that law), access (art 34 of that law) and rectify (art 36 of that law) your personal data. You may thus request that your data, should it be inaccurate, incomplete, unclear, outdated, not be used or stored, be corrected, clarified, updated or deleted.
Personal information regarding our website's visitors, including their identity, is confidential.
The owners of this website hereby guarantee to respect the legal confidentiality conditions, applicable in France, and not to disclose this data to third parties.
Close
Article Outline