Article

Access to the text (HTML) Access to the text (HTML)
PDF Access to the PDF text
Advertising


Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription.
  • If you are a subscriber, please sign in 'My Account' at the top right of the screen.

  • If you want to subscribe to this journal, see our rates



Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 62, n° 6
pages 950-956 (juin 2010)
Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.08.058
accepted : 14 August 2009
Rural-urban differences in behaviors to prevent skin cancer: An analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey
 

Whitney E. Zahnd, MS a, Jonathan Goldfarb, MD b, Steven L. Scaife, MS a, Mark L. Francis, MD a,
a Division of Rheumatology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois 
b Division of Dermatology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois 

Reprint requests: Mark L. Francis, MD, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, PO Box 19636, Springfield, IL 62794-9636.
Abstract
Background

There is concern that rural residents may be less likely to engage in behaviors to reduce their risk for skin cancer compared with urban residents.

Objectives

First, we sought to determine whether rural residents are less likely to use sunscreen and engage in other skin cancer preventive measures. Second, we sought to determine whether such actions are sufficiently explained by factors known to affect these behaviors or whether such actions are affected by rurality.

Methods

We analyzed the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey, a survey of the noninstitutionalized, adult population performed by the National Cancer Institute. We used logistic regression analysis to adjust for confounding by age, race, income, education, health insurance, smoking, sex, marital status, and region.

Results

Compared with urban residents, rural residents were 33% less likely (odds ratio = 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.80) to wear sunscreen when exposed to the sun for more than 1 hour. After adjusting for the above confounding variables, however, rural individuals were just as likely as urban individuals to use sunscreen with sun exposure.

Limitations

Inability to adjust for unmeasured confounding variables, such as occupational sun exposure, is a limitation.

Conclusion

Rural residents were less likely to use sunscreen. This decreased use of sunscreen, however, was explained by differences in age, race, income, education, and other confounding factors that negatively influence the use of sunscreen.

The full text of this article is available in PDF format.

Key words : rural, sunscreen, ultraviolet A protection, ultraviolet B protection, urban

Abbreviations used : CI, HINTS, NCI, OR



 Supported by the Department of Medicine, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
 Conflicts of interest: None declared.



© 2009  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.@@#104156@@
EM-CONSULTE.COM is registrered at the CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.
As per the Law relating to information storage and personal integrity, you have the right to oppose (art 26 of that law), access (art 34 of that law) and rectify (art 36 of that law) your personal data. You may thus request that your data, should it be inaccurate, incomplete, unclear, outdated, not be used or stored, be corrected, clarified, updated or deleted.
Personal information regarding our website's visitors, including their identity, is confidential.
The owners of this website hereby guarantee to respect the legal confidentiality conditions, applicable in France, and not to disclose this data to third parties.
Close
Article Outline