Article

2 Iconography
Access to the text (HTML) Access to the text (HTML)
PDF Access to the PDF text
Advertising


Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription.
  • If you are a subscriber, please sign in 'My Account' at the top right of the screen.

  • If you want to subscribe to this journal, see our rates



Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 63, n° 2
pages 213-218 (août 2010)
Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.08.062
accepted : 28 August 2009
Original Articles

Factors influencing pain intensity during topical photodynamic therapy of complete cosmetic units for actinic keratoses
 

Patrick Gholam, MD , Katharina Denk, MD, Tanja Sehr, MD, Alexander Enk, MD, Martin Hartmann, MD
Department of Dermatology, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany 

Reprint requests: Patrick Gholam, MD, Department of Dermatology, University Heidelberg, Voßstrasse 2, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
Background

Topical photodynamic therapy is a good treatment option for extensively photodamaged skin with multiple actinic keratoses. Pain is one of the major adverse effects during and after the treatment.

Objective

We sought to determine the pain intensity and its influencing factors during the extensive photodynamic treatment of complete cosmetic units.

Methods

In total, 104 patients with 411 treated fields were enrolled in this retrospective monocentric study. All patients had multiple actinic keratoses on the face, scalp, or back of hands and received an extensive treatment of the complete photodamaged area in our dermatologic outpatient department between February and May 2009. Pain was rated using a visual analog scale directly and 8 hours after photodynamic therapy.

Results

Multifactorial analysis of the data shows that pain intensity is dependent on sex of the patient (P  = .030) and location of the treated field (P < .001). Visual analog scale scores were independent of the age and skin type of the patient. No significant difference in pain between the use of 5-amino-4-oxo-pentanoate (methylaminolevulinate) and 5-aminolevulinic acid was noticed. During treatment, mean visual analog scale scores ± SEM of the different locations were 2.5 ± 0.36 (hand), 3.6 ± 0.35 (occiput), 5.2 ± 0.19 (forehead), 5.9 ± 0.20 (cheeks), and 7.4 ± 0.48 (lips). Eight hours after treatment the mean pain ± SEM in all locations was reduced significantly (P < .001) from 5.2 ± 0.14 to 3.0 ± 0.14. The rate of therapy interruptions showed a significant correlation (P  = .044) with the location of the treated field. In all, 71% of the patients showed a good and 29% a poor clinical outcome.

Limitations

Because of the retrospective study design not all factors that may influence pain (eg, protoporphyrin IX fluorescence) were recorded.

Conclusion

These results show that pain intensity is dependent on the location of the treated field. Pain intensity is higher in male patients. After 8 hours pain decreases significantly.

The full text of this article is available in PDF format.

Key words : actinic keratoses, location, pain, photodamage, photodynamic therapy

Abbreviations used : AK, ALA, MAL, PDT, PpIX



 Funding sources: None.
 Conflicts of interest: None declared.



© 2009  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.@@#104156@@
EM-CONSULTE.COM is registrered at the CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.
As per the Law relating to information storage and personal integrity, you have the right to oppose (art 26 of that law), access (art 34 of that law) and rectify (art 36 of that law) your personal data. You may thus request that your data, should it be inaccurate, incomplete, unclear, outdated, not be used or stored, be corrected, clarified, updated or deleted.
Personal information regarding our website's visitors, including their identity, is confidential.
The owners of this website hereby guarantee to respect the legal confidentiality conditions, applicable in France, and not to disclose this data to third parties.
Close
Article Outline