1 Iconography
Access to the text (HTML) Access to the text (HTML)
PDF Access to the PDF text

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription.
  • If you are a subscriber, please sign in 'My Account' at the top right of the screen.

  • If you want to subscribe to this journal, see our rates

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 58, n° 2
pages 211-216 (février 2008)
Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.09.032
accepted : 24 September 2007

Who else is providing care in dermatology practices? Trends in the use of nonphysician clinicians

Jack S. Resneck, MD a, , Alexa B. Kimball, MD, MPH b
a Department of Dermatology, and Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California 
b Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 

Reprint requests: Jack S. Resneck Jr, MD, University of California, San Francisco, Dermatology, Box 0316, San Francisco, CA 94143-0316.

The US dermatology workforce, which is affected by a physician shortage, has reportedly seen a rapid and substantial influx of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs). Little is known about which dermatology practices use these practitioners, how they are supervised, and the services they are providing.


We analyzed results of the American Academy of Dermatology’s 2007 practice profile survey to learn more about patterns of nonphysician clinician (NPC) use. Of 3965 surveys mailed, responses were obtained from 1243 dermatologists (31% response rate). Comparison data were drawn from previous surveys conducted with a similar methodology in 2002 (35% response rate) and 2005 (30% response rate).


Overall, 325 responding dermatologists (29.6%) reported using PAs, NPs, or both in their practices in 2007, a 43% increase from the proportion in 2002 (20.7%). PAs were more prevalent than NPs (23% vs 10%). By the year 2010, 36.2% of respondents plan to hire these NPCs. Younger cohorts of dermatologists were significantly more likely to use NPCs (P = .006), as were those in group and academic practices (P < .0001). Respondents seeking to hire additional dermatologists (P < .0001) and those with surgical or cosmetically focused practices (P < .001) were much more likely to use NPCs. Respondents reported supervising their NPCs on-site 92.8% of the time, but 31% were off-site 10% of the time or more. Most dermatologists allowed their NPCs to see new patients and established patients with new problems, and a minority of these patients were formally presented to a physician during extender visits. NPCs spent the majority of their time seeing medical dermatology patients, even if their supervising dermatologist was primarily engaged in surgical or cosmetic dermatology.


Survey respondents might have inaccurately reported practice characteristics or might not be representative of all US dermatologists.


In the setting of persistently long patient wait times and difficulty recruiting new physician staff, dermatologists have rapidly turned to PAs and NPs to help meet patient demand for care. These NPCs are primarily caring for new and established medical dermatology patients under indirect supervision. In the absence of explicit consensus or policy as to how the field should ensure future access to care for patients with skin disease, growth in the use of NPCs has continued, with significant variation in use and supervision patterns.

The full text of this article is available in PDF format.

Abbreviations used : AAD, NP, NPC, PA

 The practice profile surveys were funded by the American Academy of Dermatology Association, which had no role in our independent analyses; interpretation of data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
 Disclosure: Dr Resneck received a career development award from the Dermatology Foundation and chairs the Workforce Task Force of the American Academy of Dermatology. Dr Kimball has no conflicts of interest to declare.
 Limited preliminary results were presented in abstract form at the 2007 American Association of Medical Colleges Workforce Meeting, Bethesda, Maryland, May 3, 2007.

© 2008  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.@@#104156@@
EM-CONSULTE.COM is registrered at the CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.
As per the Law relating to information storage and personal integrity, you have the right to oppose (art 26 of that law), access (art 34 of that law) and rectify (art 36 of that law) your personal data. You may thus request that your data, should it be inaccurate, incomplete, unclear, outdated, not be used or stored, be corrected, clarified, updated or deleted.
Personal information regarding our website's visitors, including their identity, is confidential.
The owners of this website hereby guarantee to respect the legal confidentiality conditions, applicable in France, and not to disclose this data to third parties.
Article Outline