4 Iconography
Access to the text (HTML) Access to the text (HTML)
PDF Access to the PDF text

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription.
  • If you are a subscriber, please sign in 'My Account' at the top right of the screen.

  • If you want to subscribe to this journal, see our rates

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 63, n° 5
pages 751-761 (novembre 2010)
Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.02.056
accepted : 16 February 2010
Original Articles

Pathologic nodal evaluation improves prognostic accuracy in Merkel cell carcinoma: Analysis of 5823 cases as the basis of the first consensus staging system

Bianca D. Lemos, MD a, , Barry E. Storer, PhD d, , Jayasri G. Iyer, MD a, , Jerri Linn Phillips, MA, CTR e, Christopher K. Bichakjian, MD f, L. Christine Fang, MD b, Timothy M. Johnson, MD f, Nanette J. Liegeois-Kwon, MD, PhD h, Clark C. Otley, MD i, Kelly G. Paulson, PhD a, Merrick I. Ross, MD g, Siegrid S. Yu, MD k, Nathalie C. Zeitouni, MD l, David R. Byrd, MD c, n, Vernon K. Sondak, MD j, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, MD g, Arthur J. Sober, MD m, Paul Nghiem, MD, PhD a, d, n,
a Department of Medicine/Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 
b Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 
c Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 
d Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 
e Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois 
f Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 
g University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 
h Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 
i Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 
j H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute and the University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 
k Department of Dermatology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 
l University of Buffalo, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York 
m Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 
n Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington 

Reprint requests: Paul Nghiem, MD, PhD, 815 Mercer St, Brotman 242, Seattle, WA 98109.

The management of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) has been complicated by a lack of detailed prognostic data and by the presence of conflicting staging systems.


We sought to determine the prognostic significance of tumor size, clinical versus pathologic nodal evaluation, and extent of disease at presentation and thereby derive the first consensus staging/prognostic system for MCC.


A total of 5823 prospectively enrolled MCC cases from the National Cancer Data Base had follow-up data (median 64 months) and were used for prognostic analyses.


At 5 years, overall survival was 40% and relative survival (compared with age- and sex-matched population data) was 54%. Among all MCC cases, 66% presented with local, 27% with nodal, and 7% with distant metastatic disease. For cases presenting with local disease only, smaller tumor size was associated with better survival (stage I, ≤2 cm, 66% relative survival at 5 years; stage II, >2 cm, 51%; P  < .0001). Patients with clinically local-only disease and pathologically proven negative nodes had better outcome (76% at 5 years) than those who only underwent clinical nodal evaluation (59%, P  < .0001).


The National Cancer Data Base does not capture disease-specific survival. Overall survival for patients with MCC was therefore used to calculate relative survival based on matched population data.


Although the majority (68%) of patients with MCC in this nationwide cohort did not undergo pathologic nodal evaluation, this procedure may be indicated in many cases as it improves prognostic accuracy and has important treatment implications for those found to have microscopic nodal involvement.

The full text of this article is available in PDF format.

Key words : clinical staging, Merkel cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin, pathologic staging, prognosis, sentinel lymph node biopsy, staging

Abbreviations used : AJCC, F/U, MCC, NCDB, TNM

 Dr Lemos is currently affiliated with the Department of Dermatology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
 Supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) K02-AR50993; American Cancer Society (ACS) RSG-08-115-01-CCE; ACS Jerry Wachter Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) Fund; NIH K24-CA139052; an unrestricted educational grant from Schering Pharmaceutical, Kenilworth, NJ; the David & Rosalind Bloom Endowment for MCC Research; and the University of Washington MCC Patient Gift Fund.
 Conflicts of interest: None declared.

  These authors contributed equally to this study.

© 2010  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.@@#104156@@
EM-CONSULTE.COM is registrered at the CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.
As per the Law relating to information storage and personal integrity, you have the right to oppose (art 26 of that law), access (art 34 of that law) and rectify (art 36 of that law) your personal data. You may thus request that your data, should it be inaccurate, incomplete, unclear, outdated, not be used or stored, be corrected, clarified, updated or deleted.
Personal information regarding our website's visitors, including their identity, is confidential.
The owners of this website hereby guarantee to respect the legal confidentiality conditions, applicable in France, and not to disclose this data to third parties.
Article Outline