Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription.
  • If you are a subscriber, please sign in 'My Account' at the top right of the screen.

  • If you want to subscribe to this journal, see our rates



Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 23, n° 2P1
pages 288-294 (août 1990)
Doi : 10.1016/0190-9622(90)70212-Z
Dermatopathology

Comparison of methods for checking surgical margins
 

Ronald P. Rapini, MD , 1
Houston, Texas, USA 

*Reprint requests: Ronald P. Rapini, MD, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St., MSMB1202, Houston, TX 77030.
@@#100979@@

Surgical margins of a cutaneous neoplasm can be evaluated by various combinations of three major types of sections: vertical (perpendicular), horizontal (parallel), and oblique (Mohs method). Vertical sections may run transversely through tumor (breadloaf method), longitudinally through tumor (breadloaf-cross method), or peripheral to the tumor. The peripheral (perimeter) sectioning methods are the only methods that can evaluate almost 100% of the margin, but they have the disadvantage of not showing the relationship of the tumor to its margin, which can be seen clearly with the vertical transverse sections. Seven methods of checking surgical margins are compared and contrasted. None of these is judged to be perfect or best.

The full text of this article is available in PDF format.
1  From the Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, University of Texas Medical School.

Top of the page

© 1990  Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.