Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek's safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? Case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls - 18/08/17
, S. Putman b, R. Desmarchelier c, E. Sari Ali d, P. Chiron a, M. Ollivier e, J.Y. Jenny f, D. Waast g, C. Mabit h, E. de Thomasson i, C. Schwartz j, P. Oger k, L.E. Gayet l, H. Migaud b, N. Ramdane m, M.H. Fessy cSFHG1
Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.
Conéctese para beneficiarse!
Abstract |
Background |
Various factors contribute to instability of total hip arthroplasty (THA), with implant orientation being a major contributor. We performed a case-control study with computed tomography (CT) data to determine whether: 1) orientation contributes to THA instability and 2) a safer target zone for stability than Lewinnek's classic safe zone can be defined.
Material and methods |
We included prospectively 363 cases of THA dislocation that occurred during the calendar 2013 year in 24 participating hospitals. Of the 128 dislocations that occurred in patients who underwent THA at these centers, 56 (24 anterior, 32 posterior) had CT scans, thus were included in the analysis. The control group was matched 4:1 based on implant type, year of implantation, age, sex, bearing types and THA indication. Of the 428 matched control THA cases, 93 had CT scans. In all, the CT scans from 149 cases (56 unstable, 93 stable) were analyzed to determine the acetabular cup's inclination and anteversion, and the femoral stem's anteversion.
Results |
In the unstable THA group, cup inclination was 46.9°±7.4°, cup anteversion was 20.4°±10.8° and stem anteversion was 14.2°±9.9°. In the stable THA group, cup inclination was 44.9°±5.3° (P=0.057), cup anteversion was 22.1°±5.1° (P=0.009) and stem anteversion was 13.4°±4.4° (P=0.362). The optimal total anteversion (cup+stem) of 40–60° was achieved in 16.5% of unstable THA cases and 13.9% of stable THA cases, thus this parameter does not predict stability (odds ratio [OR] of 0.40, P=0.144). The cup was positioned in Lewinnek's safe zone in 44.6% of patients in the unstable group and 68.2% of those in the stable group (OR 3.74, P=0.003). A target zone defined as 40–50° inclination and 15–30° anteversion was better able to distinguish between unstable cases (23.2%) and stable cases (71.6%) resulting in an OR of 13.91 (P<0.001).
Discussion |
Implant positioning was the only risk factor for instability found in this study. Moreover, our findings reinforce the theory put forward by other authors that Lewinnek's safe zone is not specific enough to differentiate between stable and unstable THA implantations. The target zone for acetabular cups proposed here (40–50° inclination and 15°–30° anteversion) is related to a lower risk of instability. This orientation can be used as a guide, but must be combined with other technical elements to optimize stability. By balancing stability and biomechanics, the 40–50° inclination and 15°–30° anteversion target zone redefines the optimal positioning window.
Level of evidence |
III case-control study.
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Keywords : THA, Dislocation, Safe zone, Approach
Esquema
| ☆ | Work of the French Hip & Knee Society (SFHG). |
Vol 103 - N° 5
P. 657-661 - septembre 2017 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente
- Hip-spine syndrome: A cadaveric analysis between osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine and hip joints
- D.S. Weinberg, J.J. Gebhart, R.W. Liu
- What are the risk factors for dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty? A multicenter case-control study of 128 unstable and 438 stable hips
- M.H. Fessy, S. Putman, A. Viste, R. Isida, N. Ramdane, A. Ferreira, A. Leglise, B. Rubens-Duval, N. Bonin, F. Bonnomet, A. Combes, S. Boisgard, D. Mainard, S. Leclercq, H. Migaud, SFHG 1
Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.