Suscribirse

The effect of two lumbar belt designs on trunk repositioning sense in people with and without low back pain - 23/08/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.03.002 
Jean-Alexandre Boucher a, e, , Nicolas Roy b, Richard Preuss c, d, Christian Larivière c, e
a School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada 
b School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, 150, place Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada 
c Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Institut de réadaptation Gingras-Lindsay de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada 
d School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 3654, promenade Sir-William-Osler, Montréal, QC, H3G 1Y5, Canada 
e Occupational Health and Safety Research Institute Robert-Sauvé (IRSST), 505, boulevard de Maisonneuve-O., Montréal, QC, H3A 3C2, Canada 

Corresponding author. Occupational Health and Safety Research Institute Robert-Sauvé, 505, boulevard de Maisonneuve Ouest, Montréal (Québec), Canada, H3A 3C2. Fax: +514 288 6097.

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Abstract

Objectives

Low back pain (LBP) has previously been associated with impaired lumbar proprioception, which may lead to and/or perpetuate joint instability as a cause of LBP. Wearing a lumbar belt (LB) may be beneficial in this regard. The primary aim was to determine the effect of 2 LB designs (extensible and non-extensible) on trunk repositioning sense in people with and without LBP. A secondary aim was to evaluate whether patients showing different clinical signs of lumbar instability differentially benefit from LBs in terms of lumbar proprioception.

Design

Within-group experimental study with a healthy control group.

Methods

In total, 38 patients with LBP and 19 healthy controls participated in this study. Lumbar proprioception (position sense) was measured with participants sitting in a device that allowed for generating movements in axial rotation. Three experimental conditions were compared: (1) no LB, (2) extensible LB, (3) non-extensible LB. Four repositioning errors were computed for each experimental condition: constant error (CE), absolute error (AE), variable error (VE) and total variability (E).

Results

CE and AE scores were higher for LBP patients than healthy controls (all P<0.001), but scores did not significantly differ by condition. Additional subgroup analyses of clinical signs of instability were inconclusive, showing the same results in LBP patients with low and high instability scores (all P<0.001).

Conclusions

This study confirms a significant loss of proprioception in trunk axial rotation in patients with LBP. Wearing an LB did not improve proprioception, but the contact between the LB and the skin might depend on the movement direction. Future studies should investigate the 3 planes of motion while eliminating the effect of the vestibular system.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Proprioception, Trunk repositioning sense, Repositioning error, Low back pain, Lumbar belt


Esquema


© 2017  Elsevier Masson SAS. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 60 - N° 5

P. 306-311 - septembre 2017 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Workers’ perspectives on return to work after total knee arthroplasty
  • Pascale Maillette, Marie-France Coutu, Nathaly Gaudreault
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Variable compensation during the sit-to-stand task among individuals with severe knee osteoarthritis
  • Yoshimasa Sagawa, Alice Bonnefoy-Mazure, Stéphane Armand, Anne Lubbeke, Pierre Hoffmeyer, Domizio Suva, Katia Turcot

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.