Suscribirse

Central venous occlusion in hemodialysis access: Comparison between percutaneous transluminal angioplasty alone and nitinol or stainless-steel stent placement - 24/08/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.diii.2019.03.011 
S. Gür a, , L. Oğuzkurt b, M. Gedikoğlu c
a Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Turkey 
b Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Koc University, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Turkey 
c Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Baskent University, Faculty of Medicine, Adana Turkey 

Corresponding author at: Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Faculty of Medicine, Karabaglar Izmir, 35360, Turkey.Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Faculty of MedicineKarabaglar Izmir35360Turkey

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the primary and secondary patency rates of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) alone with those of metallic stent placement in patients with hemodialysis access and central venous occlusion (CVO) and to compare the respective effects of nitinol and stainless-steel stents on patency.

Materıals and methods

A total of 150 consecutive patients with hemodialysis access who underwent endovascular treatment for symptomatic CVO with ipsilateral functioning hemodialysis access were evaluated. There were 67 men and 83 women with a mean age of 56.2±15.2 (SD) years (range: 15–86 years). The primary endovascular treatment of CVO was PTA alone. Stent placement either with nitinol or stainless-steel stents was performed as a bailout procedure. The results were analyzed on a per patient basis.

Results

Technical success was achieved in 141/150 patients (94%). Of the 141 patients, 109 (77%) underwent PTA alone and 32 (23%) underwent stent placement. The mean number of interventions in the stent group [4.3±2.5 (SD)] was significantly higher than that in the PTA alone group [2.6±2.8 (SD)] (P=0.002). The primary patency rates at 12, 24, and 60 months for the stent group (58.7%, 41.9%, and 27.9%, respectively) were significantly higher than those in the PTA alone group (42.4%, 36.3%, and 20.2%, respectively) (P=0.036). Secondary patency rates at 12, 24, and 60 months for the stent group (87.6%, 80.7%, and 50.3%, respectively) were significantly greater than those in the PTA alone group (68.4%, 56%, and 38.6%, respectively) (P=0.046). Furthermore, the primary patency rates at 6 and 12 months in the nitinol stent group (89% and 80.9%, respectively) were significantly greater than those in the stainless-steel stent group (78.8% and 38.4%, respectively) (P=0.007). The secondary patency rates at 6, 12 and 24 months for the nitinol stent group (92.8%, 87.7% and 65.8%, respectively) were significantly greater than those in the stainless-steel stent group (85.7%, 76.2% and 65.3%, respectively) (P=0.011).

Conclusıon

Although PTA alone is an effective interventional treatment strategy of CVO in short term, stent placement yields greater primary and secondary patency rates in the long-term. But the mean number of interventions per vein after stenting is significantly higher. Close follow-up and multiple re-interventions are necessary to ensure long-term patency.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Central vein occlusion, Angioplasty, Hemodialysis, Central venous occlusion, Stenting


Esquema


© 2019  Société française de radiologie. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 100 - N° 9

P. 485-492 - septembre 2019 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • 3D CT cinematic rendering of the spleen: Potential role in problem solving
  • S.P. Rowe, L.C. Chu, E.K. Fishman
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty alone versus stent placement for the treatment of transplant renal artery stenosis
  • M. Macchini, T. Mokrane, J. Darcourt, J. Bellière, N. Kamar, R. Candelari, H. Rousseau, O. Meyrignac

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.