Suscribirse

Laparoscopic omental patch for perforated peptic ulcer disease reduces length of stay and complications, compared to open surgery: A SWSC multicenter study - 21/11/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.002 
Adel Alhaj Saleh a, Esteban C. Esquivel a, John T. Lung a, Barbara C. Eaton b, Brandon R. Bruns b, Galinos Barmparas c, Daniel R. Margulies c, Alexander Raines d, Cressilee Bryant d, Christopher E. Crane e, Elizabeth P. Scherer e, Thomas J. Schroeppel f, Eliza Moskowitz f, Justin Regner g, Richard Frazee g, Eric M. Campion h, Matthew Bartley h, Jared Mortus i, Jeremy Ward i, Mhd Hasan Almekdash j, Sharmila Dissanaike a,
a Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA 
b Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MD, USA 
c Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA 
d Department of Surgery, Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA 
e Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA 
f Department of Surgery, UCHealth Memorial Hospital Center, Colorado Springs, CO, USA 
g Department of Surgery, Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, TX, USA 
h Department of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA 
i Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Ben Taub, TX, USA 
j Clinical Research Institute, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA 

Corresponding author.Department of Surgery Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center 3601 4th Street Stop 8312, Lubbock, TX, 79430, USA.Department of Surgery Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center3601 4th Street Stop 8312LubbockTX79430USA

Abstracts

RCTs showed benefits in Lap repair of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU).

The SWSC Multi-Center Trials Group sought to evaluate whether Lap omental patch repairs compared to Open improved outcomes in PPU in general practice.

Data was collected from 9 SWSC Trial Group centers. Demographics, operative time, 30-day complications, length of stay and mortality were included.

461 patients

Open in 311(67%) patients, Lap in 132(28%) with 20(5%) patients converted from Lap to Open. Groups were similar at baseline. Significant variability was found between centers in their utilization of Lap (0–67%).

Complications at 30 days were lower in Lap (18.5% vs. 27.5%, p < 0.05) as was unplanned re-operation (4.7% vs 14%, p < 0.05). Lap reduced LOS (6 vs 8 days, p < 0.001). Ileus was more in Lap (42% vs 18 p < 0.001) operative time was 14 min higher in Lap(p < 0.01) and admission to OR time was 4 h higher in Lap(<0.05). No significant difference readmission or mortality.

Our results suggest Lap should be considered a first-line option in suitable PPU patients requiring omental patch repair in centers that have the capacity and resources 24/7.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Highlights

In this multicenter study, there was wide variation in use of laparoscopy for perforated peptic ulcer from 0 – 67%.
Patients undergoing laparoscopic repair had significantly shorter length of stay at 6 versus 8 days.
Complications were lower in the laparoscopic group, at 18.5% versus 27.5%.
There was no difference in readmission or mortality.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


© 2019  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 218 - N° 6

P. 1060-1064 - décembre 2019 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Comparing treatment patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma at academic centers and non-academic centers within the Mountain Region
  • Daniel Cheng, Chad L. Cross, Gregory Calfee, Daniel Kirgan, Shelley J. Williams, Jennifer Baynosa, Charles R. St Hill
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • It's sooner than you think: Blunt solid organ injury patients are already hypercoagulable upon hospital admission - Results of a bi-institutional, prospective study
  • Julia R. Coleman, Annika B. Kay, Ernest E. Moore, Hunter B. Moore, Eduardo Gonzalez, Sarah Majercik, Mitchell J. Cohen, Thomas White, Fredric M. Pieracci

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.