Suscribirse

Follow-up radiographs in isolated Greater Tuberosity fractures lead to a change in treatment recommendation; an online survey study - 10/04/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.12.005 
Marieke F. van Wier a, Ihsane Amajjar a, Noortje C. Hagemeijer b, Femke M.A.P. Claessen b, Michel P.J. van den Bekerom a, Derek F.P. van Deurzen a,
a Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG, Oosterpark 9, 1091 Amsterdam, The Netherlands 
b Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 

Corresponding author.

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Abstract

Introduction

It is common practice to obtain follow-up radiographs of non-operatively treated isolated greater tuberosity (GT) fractures 1 to 2 weeks after trauma. However, the majority of non-operatively treated GT fractures remain stable and do not require reconsideration of the initial treatment decision. Radiological follow-up therefore might be unnecessary. Our primary objective was to study whether radiological folow-up changes the initial treatment recommendation, hypothesizing no change.

Materials and methods

Radiographs of 25 patients diagnosed with an isolated GT fracture were selected from our hospital database and presented on a web-based platform. Sixty-eight trauma- and orthopedic surgeons evaluated these radiographs. First the radiographs directly post-trauma and then, in random order, the radiographs 5-14 days post-trauma alongside the first radiographs. Each observer evaluated each set of radiographs once. The observers answered which treatment they would recommend (non-operative/operative), and how certain they were about their advice (absolutely certain, certain, some doubt, very uncertain). Recommendation-consistency and inter-observer agreement are presented as percentages and intra class correlation coefficients (ICC).

Results

Overall, 84% (95% CI 82.1–85.8) of treatment recommendations was unchanged after evaluation of the second radiograph. Agreement within each observer ranged from 60 to 98%. The mean proportion of patients about whom the observers were (absolutely) certain of their recommendation increased from 70% at the first evaluation to 83% at the second evaluation (12.8; 95% CI 9.8–15.9). Furthermore, the ICC between the surgeons improved from 0.37 (95% CI 0.26–0.54) for the first evaluation to 0.60 (95% CI 0.47–0.74) for the second.

Conclusion

In 16% of the patients the treatment recommendation for an isolated GT fracture changed after the evaluation of radiographs 1 to 2 weeks post-trauma. In addition, surgeons were more certain about their recommendation and there was less inter-observer variation. Radiological follow-up of a non-operatively treated isolated GT fracture therefore seems justifiable.

Level of evidence

III, diagnostic study.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Agreement on treatment, Imaging, Isolated greater tuberosity fracture


Esquema


© 2020  Elsevier Masson SAS. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 106 - N° 2

P. 255-259 - avril 2020 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Biomechanical evaluation of a new technique for acromioclavicular stabilization
  • Ian Peeters, Stijn Herregodts, Lieven De Wilde, Alexander Van Tongel
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Early versus delayed corpectomy in thoracic and lumbar spine trauma. A long-term clinical and radiological retrospective study
  • Pierre Grobost, Mehdi Boudissa, Gaël Kerschbaumer, Sébastien Ruatti, Jérôme Tonetti

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.