Suscribirse

Posterior-superior insular deep transcranial magnetic stimulation alleviates peripheral neuropathic pain — A pilot double-blind, randomized cross-over study - 24/06/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.neucli.2021.06.003 
Liu Dongyang a, Ana Mércia Fernandes a, Pedro Henrique Martins da Cunha a, Raissa Tibes a, João Sato a, Clarice Listik a, Camila Dale a, Gabriel Taricani Kubota a, Ricardo Galhardoni a, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira a, Valquíria Aparecida da Silva a, Jefferson Rosi a, Daniel Ciampi de Andrade a, b,
a LIM-62, Pain Center, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, 5th Floor, P.O. Box: 05403-900, São Paulo, SP, Brazil 
b Pain Center Instituto do Câncer Octavio Frias de Oliveira, University of São Paulo, Avenida Dr. Arnaldo 251, P.O. Box: 01246-000, São Paulo, SP, Brazil 

Corresponding author at: Divisão de Clínica Neurocirúrgica do Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP, Instituto Central, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, 5° Andar, Sala 5084, Cerqueira César, 05403-900, São Paulo, Brazil.Divisão de Clínica Neurocirúrgica do Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSPInstituto CentralAv. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar2555° AndarSala 5084Cerqueira CésarSão Paulo05403-900Brazil
En prensa. Pruebas corregidas por el autor. Disponible en línea desde el Thursday 24 June 2021
This article has been published in an issue click here to access

Abstract

Objectives

Peripheral neuropathic pain (pNeP) is prevalent, and current treatments, including drugs and motor cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) leave a substantial proportion of patients with suboptimal pain relief.

Methods

We explored the intensity and short-term duration of the analgesic effects produced in pNeP patients by 5 days of neuronavigated deep rTMS targeting the posterior superior insula (PSI) with a double-cone coil in a sham-controlled randomized cross-over trial.

Results

Thirty-one pNeP patients received induction series of five active or sham consecutive sessions of daily deep-rTMS to the PSI in a randomized sequence, with a washout period of at least 21 days between series. The primary outcome [number of responders (>50% pain intensity reduction from baseline in a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 to 10)] was significantly higher after real (58.1%) compared to sham (19.4%) stimulation (p = 0.002). The number needed to treat was 2.6, and the effect size was 0.97 [95% CI (0.6; 1.3)]. One week after the 5th stimulation day, pain scores were no longer different between groups, and no difference in neuropathic pain characteristics and interference with daily living were present. No major side effects occurred, and milder adverse events (i.e., short-lived headaches after stimulation) were reported in both groups. Blinding was effective, and analgesic effects were not affected by sequence of the stimulation series (active-first or sham-first), age, sex or pain duration of participants.

Discussion

PSI deep-rTMS was safe in refractory pNeP and was able to provide significant pain intensity reduction after a five-day induction series of treatments. Post-hoc assessment of neuronavigation targeting confirmed deep-rTMS was delivered within the boundaries of the PSI in all participants.

Conclusion

PSI deep-rTMS provided significant pain relief during 5-day induction sessions compared to sham stimulation.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Insula, Neuropathic pain, Neuronavigation, Peripheral neuropathy, Transcranial magnetic stimulation


Esquema


© 2021  Elsevier Masson SAS. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.