Suscribirse

Factors Associated With Visual Field Testing Reliability in Children With Glaucoma or Suspected Glaucoma - 17/07/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.04.005 
Anika Kumar a, Natan Hekmatjah a, Yinxi Yu b, Ying Han c, Gui-Shuang Ying b, Julius T. Oatts c,
a From the University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA 
b Scheie Eye Institute, Center for Preventive Ophthalmology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA 
c Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA 

Inquiries to Julius Oatts, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USADepartment of OphthalmologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA

Highlights

In children with glaucoma/suspect, 51.3% of visual field tests were reliable.
Test reliability was associated with older age and better baseline visual acuity.
Reliability was also associated with English as primary language.
A significant learning effect was not observed with repeated testing.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Resumen

Purpose

To evaluate Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) test reliability and its associated risk factors in children with glaucoma or glaucoma suspect.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

None.

Setting

Single-center childhood glaucoma clinic.

Patient Population

One hundred thirty-six patients aged ≤18 years with glaucoma/glaucoma suspect, and least 1 completed 24 to 2 HVF test between 2018 and 2023.

Observation Procedure

Demographic and clinical characteristics including age, primary language, visual acuity (VA), and glaucoma diagnosis were extracted from electronic health records.

Main Outcome Measures

HVF 24 to 2 testing metrics, including FP, FN, and FL. Tests were defined as reliable using manufacturer guidelines of ≤33% FP, ≤33% FN, and ≤20% FL. For each patient, a reliability score was calculated as the percentage of reliable tests among all tests completed. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine factors associated with test-level reliability (yes/no). A multivariable linear regression model was used to determine factors associated with patient-level reliability score.

Results

Among 634 HVFs from 136 patients (Mean ± SD age at first test 12.0 ± 3.2 years, 47.8% female), 51.3% were reliable. Older age, better baseline VA, and English as primary language were associated with greater odds of test-level reliability (P < .04). Mean ± SD patient-level reliability score was 51.7 ± 38.1%. Older age at first clinic visit, better baseline VA, and English as primary language were associated with higher reliability scores (all P < .02), and number of prior VF tests was not (P = .56).

Conclusions

Younger age, worse visual acuity, and non-English as primary language were associated with decreased reliability and should be considered when interpreting VF testing in children. A significant learning effect was not observed with repeated testing.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


 Supplemental Material available at AJO.com.
 Meeting Presentation: The research findings of this manuscript will be presented as an oral presentation at the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus meeting in 2024.


© 2024  The Author(s). Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 264

P. 187-193 - août 2024 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Eight Years and Beyond Longitudinal Changes of Peripapillary Structures on OCT in Adult Myopia
  • Yi Dai, Li Wang, Jie Hong, Xinghuai Sun
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Racial Disparities in Glaucoma Vision Outcomes and Eye Care Utilization: An IRIS Registry Analysis
  • Elizabeth C. Ciociola, Sayuri Sekimitsu, Sophie Smith, Alice C. Lorch, Joan W. Miller, Tobias Elze, Nazlee Zebardast, the IRIS Registry Analytic Center Consortium, Suzann Pershing, Leslie Hyman, Julia A. Haller, Aaron Y. Lee, Cecilia S. Lee, Flora Lum, Joan W. Miller, Alice Lorch

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.