Suscribirse

Developing indicators to suit the needs of small hospitals in a large multihospital system - 21/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.04.213 
E.W. Trovillion 1, S. Saurage 2, C. Carroll 3, J. McDonald 1, K.F. Woeltje 4
1 BJC HealthCare, St. Louis, Missouri 
2 Parkland Health Center, Farmington, Missouri 
3 Barnes-Jewish West County Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri 
4 Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 

Abstract ID 54290Monday, June 20

Abstract

ISSUE: The infection control and hospital epidemiology consortium (ICHEC) was formed in 1997 when infection control practitioners (ICPs) from 13 hospitals in a newly formed hospital system met monthly to reduce and prevent healthcare-associated infections. The system included four large hospitals, both university affiliated and community based, eight small hospitals (60-225 beds), and one pediatric hospital. Bloodstream infections (BSI), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), coronary artery bypass (CABG), and total hip and total knee replacement surgical site infection (SSI) data were collected. In 2000, in addition to the group consortium meetings, the small hospital (SH) ICPs began to meet separately to choose indicators that would be more meaningful for small facilities. Until recently, the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS) excluded hospitals with <100 beds, and so there are no recognized infection benchmarks for small hospitals.

PROJECT: SH ICPs focused on hospital-associated pneumonia (HAP), which was more prevalent than VAP. In late 2001, the SH ICPs began to collect whole-house HAP data. In January–March 2003, a HAP education module was implemented in four of eight small hospitals. ICPs focused their efforts on pneumonia surveillance processes; they spent 6 months studying how cases are found in each facility. Of the surveillance methods used (including lab reports, ICD-9 codes, antibiotic usage, and chart review), radiology reports were most easily obtainable for all ICPs. Data analysis revealed that radiology report review led to the most specific and sensitive case finding. HAP cases are entered into handheld computers and information is electronically transferred to the ICHEC database. With 2 years of data compiled, the SH ICPs are reviewing HAP rates routinely and benchmarking against a pooled system mean.

RESULTS: The mean for HAP was 0.5 per 1000 patient days at the start of this project. While rates initially increased as case finding and education improved (mean=0.75), rates have decreased over 2004 (mean=0.6).

LESSONS LEARNED: Small hospitals have unique needs within large hospital systems. The SH ICPs' interest in and support of one another led to this collaboration that served not only their own needs to collect an indicator useful to their facilities, but also provided a product that is useful to larger hospitals.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

© 2005  Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 33 - N° 5

P. e166 - juin 2005 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Results of a comprehensive quality improvement program to prevent surgical site infection in targeted case types: Inadvertent reduction of spinal surgery infection rates
  • C. Filoromo, C. Sanders
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Surgical site infection (SSI) rates after pediatric spine (PS) surgery: Is underlying diagnosis (UD) a predictor of infection (POI)?
  • K. Mackie, P. Sponseller, S. Cosgrove, T. Perl, X. Song

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.