UNDERSTANDING THE INTERSECTION BETWEEN QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, MANAGED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ACCREDITATION, AND THE PRIVATE PRACTITIONER - 06/09/11
Resumen |
In the late 1980s, the United States embarked on what is perhaps a unique experiment: the application of quality improvement (QI) techniques to the delivery of health care. QI undoubtedly has had major success in manufacturing industries where it was first applied.29 Its application to service industries has had a shorter but nonetheless similarly successful history.23 QI is a method and set of statistical tools for measuring the stability, variability, and outcomes of a process combined with a management philosophy that encourages each individual to actively participate in a collaborative effort to identify ways to improve the process and its outcomes.
The use of statistics, measurement of outcomes, and collaborative efforts to improve outcomes are also hallmarks of modern medicine; however, within health plans, practitioners may be resistant to the application of efforts to apply QI methods—even as they are deployed to regulate the health care industry itself.6
This article explores the interrelationships of QI and accreditation initiatives and the impact these have had on psychiatrists and other behavioral health practitioners. After an introduction to accreditation and QI initiatives in health care, the article focuses on these processes specifically within behavioral health care. Behavioral health has, most recently and dramatically, experienced the paradigm shifts that managed care, accreditation, and QI activities have wrought.
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Esquema
| Address reprint requests to Gary J. Mihalik, MD, MBA, The Mihalik Group, 1300 West Belmont Avenue # 500, Chicago, IL 60657 |
Vol 23 - N° 2
P. 285-296 - juin 2000 Regresar al númeroBienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.
¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?
