Mechanical comparison between lengthened and short sacroiliac screws in sacral fracture fixation: A finite element analysis - 12/07/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.03.023

Y. Zhao ^a,^⁎ , S. Zhang ^a, T. Sun ^a, D. Wang ^a, W. Lian ^b, J. Tan ^a, D. Zou ^a, Y. Zhao ^a
^a Orthopaedics Department, Yantai Shan Hospital, 91#, Jiefang Road, Yantai 264008, P.R. China
^b CT/MR Department, Yantai Shan Hospital, 91#, Jiefang Road, Yantai 264008, P.R. China

^⁎Corresponding author.

conectar o crear una cuenta

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

En prensa. Pruebas corregidas por el autor. Disponible en línea desde el Friday 12 July 2013
This article has been published in an issue click here to access

Summary

Objective

To compare the stability of lengthened sacroiliac screw and standard sacroiliac screw for the treatment of unilateral vertical sacral fractures; to provide reference for clinical applications.

Methods

A finite element model of Tile type C pelvic ring injury (unilateral Denis type II fracture of the sacrum) was produced. The unilateral sacral fractures were fixed with lengthened sacroiliac screw and sacroiliac screw in six different types of models respectively. The translation and angle displacement of the superior surface of the sacrum (in standing position on both feet) were measured and compared.

Results

The stability of one lengthened sacroiliac screw fixation in S1 or S2 segment is superior to that of one sacroiliac screw fixation in the same sacral segment. The stability of one lengthened sacroiliac screw fixation in S1 and S2 segments respectively is superior to that of one sacroiliac screw fixation in S1 and S2 segments respectively. The stability of one lengthened sacroiliac screw fixation in S1 and S2 segments respectively is superior to that of one lengthened sacroiliac screw fixation in S1 or S2 segment. The stability of one sacroiliac screw fixation in S1 and S2 segments respectively is markedly superior to that of one sacroiliac screw fixation in S1 or S2 segment. The vertical and rotational stability of lengthened sacroiliac screw fixation and sacroiliac screw fixation in S2 is superior to that of S1.

Conclusion

In a finite element model of type C pelvic ring disruption, S1 and S2 lengthened sacroiliac screws should be utilized for the fixation as regularly as possible and the most stable fixation is the combination of the lengthened sacroiliac screws of S1 and S2 segments. Even if lengthened sacroiliac screws cannot be systematically used due to specific conditions, one sacroiliac screw fixation in S1 and S2 segments respectively is recommended. No matter which kind of sacroiliac screw is used, if only one screw can be implanted, the fixation in S2 segment is more recommended than that in S1.