Suscribirse

Effectiveness of CT for the detection of glenoid bone graft resorption following reverse shoulder arthroplasty - 21/05/15

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.03.010 
L.M. Ferreira a, b, c, , N.K. Knowles a, b, D.N. Richmond a, G.S. Athwal a, c
a Roth|Mcfarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, Surgical Mechatronics Laboratory, St. Josephs Health Care, London, ON, Canada 
b Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Western University, London, ON, Canada 
c Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western University, London, ON, Canada 

Corresponding author at: Roth|Mcfarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, Bioengineering Laboratory, St Joseph's Health Care, 268, Grosvenor Street, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4L6. Tel.: +519 646 6000x61351; fax: +519 646 6049.

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Abstract

Introduction

Glenoid bone grafting is often used in cases of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with glenoid deficiency. Additionally, bony increased-offset RSA (BIO-RSA) uses a cylindrical bonegraft harvested from the humeral head and is positioned beneath the glenoid baseplate to increase lateralization. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) has been used to detect glenoid bonegraft resorption, which is typically identified by a gap between the bonegraft and baseplate; however, CT images are often degraded by implant metal artifact. The purpose of this CT imaging study was to determine if a simulated bonegraft resorption gap is detectable following RSA with glenoid bone grafting.

Hypothesis

CT is unable to detect bone graft resorption following reverse shoulder arthroplasty conducted with bone grafting beneath the glenoid baseplate.

Materials and methods

RSA with glenoid bone grafting was performed on four cadaver shoulders. Glenoid bonegraft resorption gaps were simulated by fixing the implant at six different gap widths (0, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8mm). Clinical CT scans were acquired for each gap resulting in 6 scans per specimen. Two experienced observers (blinded) analyzed DICOM images in the axial and coronal directions, and measured gap widths using Mimics® software. Each observer had access to approximately 200 images per condition per specimen.

Results

The sensitivity of CT imaging to positively identify bonegraft resorption was 38%, with an accuracy of 46%. Inter-observer agreement was 92%. Observers tended to visualize no-gap for most conditions. Resorption gap width measurements were consistently underestimated.

Discussion

Metal artifact prevented identification of simulated bonegraft resorption gaps and observers most often determined that there was bonegraft-to-implant “healing” on CT, when in fact a gap was clinically present. This study illustrates the need for more effective imaging techniques to determine if bonegraft resorption has occurred following RSA.

Level of evidence

Level IV. Basic Science; Cadaveric Study.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Bony increased-offset, Reverse shoulder, BIO-RSA, Bonegraft, Bone growth


Esquema


© 2015  Elsevier Masson SAS. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 101 - N° 4

P. 427-430 - juin 2015 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Inferior tilt fixation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A biomechanical study
  • S.W. Chae, J. Lee, S.H. Han, S.-Y. Kim
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Is there any advantage in placing an additional calcar screw in locked nailing of proximal humeral fractures?
  • J.C. Katthagen, M. Schwarze, L. Bauer, J. Meyer-Kobbe, C. Voigt, C. Hurschler, H. Lill

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.