Abbonarsi

Use of morselized allografts for acetabular reconstruction during THA revision: French multicenter study of 508 cases with 8 years’ average follow-up - 27/08/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.02.025 
Roger Erivan a, , Pierre-Alain Matthieu b, Bertrand Boyer c, d, e, Nicolas Reina f, Michel Rhame g, René-Christopher Rouchy h, Sébastien Moreau i, Thomas Sanchez j, Olivier Roche k, Jacques Caton l, Jean-Louis Rouvillain m, Gilles Missenard n, o, Nassima Ramdane p, Aurélien Mulliez q, Stéphane Descamps a, Stéphane Boisgard a
the

French Society of Orthopedic and Traumatological Surgery (SoFCOT)r

a CNRS, SIGMA Clermont, ICCF, université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France 
b Département d’orthopédie-traumatologie, CHU Limoges, 2, avenue Martin-Luther-King, 87000 Limoges, France 
c Inserm, U1059, 42270 Saint-Étienne, France 
d Université Saint-Étienne, 42270 Saint-Étienne, France 
e Service d’orthopédie, hôpital La Charité, hôpital Nord, CHU Saint-Étienne, 44, rue Pointe Cadet, 42055 Saint-Étienne, France 
f Hôpital Pierre-Paul-Riquet, Institut Locomoteur, CHU de Toulouse, Allée Jean Dausset, 31059 Toulouse, France 
g Department of orthopaedic surgery and traumatology, Hautepierre hospital, Strasbourg university hospitals group, 1, avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg, France 
h Service de chirurgie orthopédique et de traumatologie du sport, urgences, hôpital Sud, CHU de Grenoble, 19, avenue de Kimberley, 38130 Échirolles, France 
i Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, CHU Paris Garches, 104, boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380 Garches, France 
j Chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologie du membre inférieur, CHU Lapeyronie, 371, avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34000 Montpellier, France 
k Centre Chirurgical Emile Gallé, CHRU Nancy, 49, rue Hermite, 54000 Nancy, France 
l Institut de chirurgie orthopédique Lyon, 103, rue Coste, 69300 Caluire-et-Cuire, France 
m Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, CHU La Meynard CS90632, 97261 Fort-de-France, Martinique, France 
n Orthopaedic department, tumor and spine unit, Bicêtre university hospital, AP–HP, 78, rue du Général Leclerc, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France 
o JE 2494 université Paris-Sud Orsay, 01405 Orsay, France 
p Unité de méthodologie – biostatistique et Data Management, CHRU de Lille, 59037 Lille, France 
q Délégation à la recherche clinique et aux innovations (DRCI), CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France 
r 56, rue Boissonnade, 75014 Paris, France 

Corresponding author.

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
Articolo gratuito.

Si connetta per beneficiarne

Abstract

Background

In the context of acetabular reconstruction, bone defects can be filled with processed or unprocessed bone allografts. Published data are often contradictory on this topic and few studies have been done comparing processed allografts to fresh-frozen ones. This led us to conduct a large study to measure the factors impacting the survival of THA revision: (1) type of allograft and cup, (2) technical factors or patient-related factors.

Hypothesis

Acetabular reconstruction can be performed equally well with frozen or processed morselized allografts.

Materials and methods

This retrospective, multicenter study of acetabular reconstruction included 508 cases with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. The follow-up for the frozen grafts was shorter (7.86 years±1.89 [5–12.32]) than that of the processed grafts (8.22 years±1.77 [5.05–15.48]) (p=0.029). However, the patients were younger at the time of the primary THA procedure in the frozen allograft group (51.5 years±14.2 [17–80]) than in the processed group (57.5 years±13.0 [12–94]) (p<0.001) and were also younger at the time of THA revision (67.8 years±12.2 [36.9–89.3] versus 70 years±11.7 [25–94.5]) (p=0.041).

Results

There were more complications overall in the frozen allograft group (46/242=19.0%) than the processed allograft group (35/256=13.2%) (p=0.044) with more instances of loosening in the frozen group (20/242 [8.2%]) than in the processed group (6/266 [3.3%])(p=0.001). Conversely, the dislocation rate (16/242=6.6% vs. 17/266=6.4%) (p=0.844) and infection rate (18/242=7.4% vs. 15/266=5.7%) (p=0.264) did not differ between groups. The subgroup analysis reveal a correlation between the occurrence of a complication and higher body mass index (BMI) (p=0.037) with a higher overall risk of complications in patients with a BMI above 30 or under 20 (p=0.006) and a relative risk of 1.95 (95% CI: 1.26–2.93). Being overweight was associated with a higher risk of dislocation (relative risk of 2.46; 95% CI: 1.23–4.70) (p=0.007). Loosening was more likely to occur in younger patients at the time of the procedure (relative risk of 2.77; 95% CI: 1.52–6.51) (p=0.040) before 60 years during the revision. Lastly, patients who were less active preoperatively based on the Devane scale had an increased risk of dislocation (relative risk of 2.51; 95% CI: 1.26–8.26) (p=0.022).

Discussion

Our hypothesis was not confirmed. The groups were not comparable initially, which may explain the differences found since the larger number of loosening cases in the frozen allograft group can be attributed to group heterogeneity. Nevertheless, morselized allografts appear to be suitable for acetabular bone defect reconstruction. A randomized study would be needed to determine whether frozen or processed allografts are superior.

Level of evidence

III, comparative retrospective study.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Allograft, THA revision, Bone reconstruction, Bone loss, Acetabular revision, Bone defect


Mappa


© 2019  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 105 - N° 5

P. 957-966 - settembre 2019 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Factors associated with hospital stay length, discharge destination, and 30-day readmission rate after primary hip or knee arthroplasty: Retrospective Cohort Study
  • Corentin Roger, Emmanuel Debuyzer, Massinissa Dehl, Yassine Bulaïd, Adnane Lamrani, Eric Havet, Patrice Mertl
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Is surface modification effective to prevent periprosthetic joint infection? A systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies
  • Wang Deng, Hongyi Shao, Hua Li, Yixin Zhou

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.