Abbonarsi

Clinical outcome of iterative meniscal suture after ACL reconstruction at a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up - 26/01/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103754 
Martin Tripon a, , César Praz a, Alexandre Ferreira a, Joffrey Drigny b, Emmanuel Reboursière b, Christophe Hulet a
a Département de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, CHU de Caen Normandie, avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14033 Caen, France 
b Département de médecine du sport, CHU de Caen, avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14033 Caen, France 

*Corresponding author: CHU de Caen Normandie, avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14000 Caen, France.CHU de Caen Normandieavenue de la Côte de NacreCaen14000France

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
Articolo gratuito.

Si connetta per beneficiarne

Abstract

Introduction

Failure rates in meniscal suture associated to ACL reconstruction range from 10 to 26.9%, often leading to meniscectomy. In young patients, the wish to conserve the meniscus may lead to iterative suture, if the lesion allows. There are no data available for clinical results of repeat meniscal suture at the same site as the primary lesion in a stabilized knee. The immediate socioeconomic cost, compared to meniscectomy, needs to be taken into account, and benefit needs to be demonstrated. The main aim of the present study was to assess the rate of secondary meniscectomy after iterative meniscal suture in stabilized knees. The study hypothesis was that failure rates are higher in iterative isolated meniscal suture after ligament reconstruction than in primary repair.

Material and methods

This single-center retrospective study analyzed patients receiving iterative meniscal suture on stable knee, between 2009 and 2019, with a minimum 26 months’ follow-up. Twenty-three patients were analyzed: 15 male, 8 female; mean age at iterative suture, 28.1±7.9 years (range, 14–49 years); mean BMI, 24.2±2.9kg/m2 (range, 19–31). Mean time to recurrence was 38.9±25.1 months (range, 6–93 months). Initial ACL graft used the patellar ligament in 69.6% of cases (n=16) and the hamstrings in 30.4% (n=7). Mean differential laximetry before iterative suture was 1.7±0.3mm (range, 1.2–2.3mm). Iterative suture was in the medial meniscus in 69.6% of cases (16/23) and in the lateral meniscus in 30.4% (7/23). Risk factors for failure, defined by requirement for meniscectomy, were assessed. Functional results were assessed on Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Tegner score.

Results

The failure rate was 48% (11/23), incorporating all lesions together. Bucket-handle tear was most frequently associated with failure (91%; p<0.01). There was significant improvement after iterative suture in subjective IKDC score (51.6±15.2 vs. 81.3±15.6; p<0.001) and KOOS scores: symptoms and stiffness, 66.6±13.7 vs. 91.1±7.53 (p<0.001); pain, 79.2±12.7 vs. 93.4±7.4 (p<0.01); function, 91.3±11.2 vs. 97.9±4.44 (p<0.001); quality of life, 38.1±23.2 vs. 62.3±30.1 (p<0.001).

Conclusion

The failure rate for iterative meniscal suture on stabilized knee was 48%. Bucket-handle tear was a major risk factor for failure (91%). Despite these high failure rates, functional results systematically improved.

Level of evidence

IV.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Anterior cruciate ligament, Retrospective study, Meniscal suture, Iterative meniscal suture, Clinical outcomes, Meniscus


Mappa


© 2023  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 110 - N° 1

Articolo 103754- febbraio 2024 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Effect of graft types for outcomes in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis
  • Chang-Hao Lin, Wei-Hsing Chih, Chen-Hao Chiang
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Does AMIC® provide improvements at least two years after surgery for knee osteochondral lesions? A multicentre retrospective study of 101 patients
  • Matthieu Peras, Alexandre Caubère, Camille Choufani, Norbert Passuti, Gilbert Versier, Olivier Barbier

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.