S'abonner

The effects of paravertebral blockade usage on pulmonary complications, atrial fibrillation and length of hospital stay following thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery - 28/04/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110770 
Chaoyang Tong, MD a, b, Jijian Zheng, MD a, 1, Jingxiang Wu, MD b, , 1
a Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China 
b Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China 

Corresponding author at: Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 Huaihai Rd. West, Shanghai 200030, China.Department of AnesthesiologyShanghai Chest HospitalShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityNo. 241 Huaihai Rd. WestShanghai200030China

Abstract

Study objective

Although combined thoracic paravertebral blockade (TPVB)-general anesthesia (GA) could improve pain control compared to GA alone after thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery, it has not been established whether this improvement in pain control could reduce associated adverse outcomes. Thus, this study aimed to explore the association between TPVB usage and adverse outcomes after thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.

Design

Retrospective cohort study from a prospective database.

Setting

A high-volume thoracic center in China.

Patients

13966 consecutive patients who received thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery from January 2016 to December 2018 in Shanghai Chest Hospital were enrolled.

Measurements

With a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, adverse outcomes between GA alone and GA-TPVB were investigated. Multivariate and multiple linear regression analysis were used to identify factors and calculate odds radio (OR) for adverse outcomes.

Results

The rate of TPVB usage was 14.8% (2070 out of 13,966). TPVB combined with GA was associated with lower rates of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) (30.4% vs 33.5%, P = 0.005) and postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) (2.1% vs 2.9%, P = 0.041), and shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) (Median [IQR]; 5[4-5] vs 5[4-6]) days, P < 0.001) compared to GA alone. After a 1:1 PSM analysis, we investigated adverse outcomes in 2640 (1320 pairs) patients with or without TPVB usage, and this association remained existed, namely, the rates of PPCs (29.8% vs 34.2%, P = 0.014) and POAF (2.2% vs 3.6%, P = 0.028) were lower and LOS was shorter (5[4-5] vs 5[4-6] days, P < 0.001) in the GA-TPVB group. In multivariate analysis, the combination of GA plus TPVB was independent predictor for PPCs (OR = 0.879, 95%CI, 0.793–0.974, P = 0.014) and POAF (OR = 0.714, 95%CI, 0.516–0.988, P = 0.042), respectively. However, in multiple linear analysis, lower rates of PPCs and POAF associated with TPVB usage, rather than TPVB usage, were responsible for the reduced LOS.

Conclusions

The usage of TPVB may be a feasible and adjustable approach to reduce the rates of PPCs and POAF and associated LOS in thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

This study retrospectively reviewed 13,966 patients who underwent thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery from January 2016 to December 2018.
In thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery, TPVB usage may be a feasible and adjustable method to reduce the rates of PPCs and POAF and associated LOS.
This study identified four independent predictors both for PPCs and POAF rarely reported in previous study, providing reference for preoperative consultation, surgical planning and risk stratification.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Thoracoscopic surgery, Lung cancer, Paravertebral blockade, Atrial fibrillation, Pulmonary complications


Plan


© 2022  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 79

Article 110770- août 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Intraoperative opioid and analgesic adjuvant administration practice patterns following implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
  • Xuezhi Dong, Brittany N. Burton, Christopher Little, Logan Woodhouse, Tristan Grogan, Jeremy M. Blumberg, Hans A. Gritsch, Siamak Rahman
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Pre-operative breathing training based on video learning reduces emergence delirium in preschool children: A randomized clinical trial
  • Li-Nan Zhang, Yi Liu, Qian-Qian Guo, Yu-Ting Ling, Fang Li, Yan-Ling Zheng, Mu-Yao Chen, Feng-Hong Chen, Nan Jiang

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.