S'abonner

Quadratus lumborum block vs. transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain control in patients with nephrectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis - 25/04/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111453 
Tianyu Gao a, b, 1, Yigang Wang a, b, 1, Yuxin Zheng a, b, Yonghao Yu a, b, Qing Li a, b, , Linlin Zhang a, b,
a Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China 
b Tianjin Research Institute of Anesthesiology, Tianjin 300052, China 

Corresponding authors at: Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.Department of AnesthesiologyTianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjin300052China

Abstract

Study objective

This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) on nephrectomy.

Design

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Patients

Patients undergoing nephrectomy.

Interventions

TAPB and QLB for postoperative analgesia.

Measurements

The primary outcome was 24 h morphine-equivalent consumptions after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), length of hospital stay after surgery, and patient satisfaction.

Main results

Fourteen studies involving 883 patients were included. Seven studies compared TAPB to control, six studies compared QLB to control, and one study compared TAPB to QLB. For direct meta-analysis of the post-surgical 24 h morphine-equivalent consumption, QLB was lower than control (mean difference [95%CI]: −18.16 [−28.96, −7.37]; I2 = 88%; p = 0.001), while there was no difference between TAPB and control (mean difference [95%CI]: −8.34 [−17.84, 1.17]; I2 = 88%; p = 0.09). Network meta-analysis showed similar findings that QLB was ranked as the best anesthetic technique for reducing postoperative 24 h opioid consumption (p-score = 0.854). Moreover, in direct meta-analysis, as compared to control, the time of first postoperative rescue analgesia was prolonged after QLB (mean difference [95%CI]: 165.00 [128.99, 201.01]; p < 0.00001), but not TAPB (mean difference [95%CI]: 296.82 [−91.92, 685.55]; p = 0.13). Meanwhile, QLB can effectively reduce opioid usages at intraoperative period, as well as at postoperative 6 h and 48 h, while TAPB can only reduce opioid consumption at 6 h after surgery. As compared to control, both TAPB and QLB exhibited the reduction in PONV and pain scores at post-surgical some timepoints. Also, QLB (mean difference [95%CI]: −0.29 [−0.49, −0.08]; p = 0.006) but not TAPB (mean difference [95%CI]: 0.60 [−0.25, 1.45]; p = 0.17) exhibited the shorter postoperative length of hospital stay than control.

Conclusions

QLB is more likely to be effective in reducing postoperative opioid use than TAPB, whereas both of them are superior to control with regard to the reduction in postoperative pain intensity and PONV.

Trial registration: PROSPERO identifier: CRD42022358464.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

QLB is more likely to be effective in reducing postoperative opioid use than TAPB.
QLB and TAPB were equivalent to reduce postoperative pain intensity.
QLB and TAPB were equivalent to reduce the incidence of PONV.
QLB shortened the postoperative length of hospital stay.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : TAPB, transversus abdominis plane block, QLB, quadratus lumborum block, Nephrectomy, Multimodal analgesia, Postoperative analgesia


Plan


© 2024  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 95

Article 111453- août 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • In response to “Counting episodes of poor-quality faculty anesthesiologists’ supervision and anesthesia residents' work habits among reported vignettes of insufficient professionalism”
  • Fei Chen, Susan M. Martinelli
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Evaluation of neuraxial analgesia on outcomes for patients undergoing robot assisted abdominal surgery
  • P. Greig, A. Sotiriou, P. Kailainathan, C.Y.M. Carvalho, D.N. Onwochei, N. Thurley, N. Desai

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.