Emergency Department Communication Links and Patterns - 15/08/11
, Ann M. Bisantz, PhD b, Michelle Sunm, BS bRésumé |
Study objective |
We characterize and describe the communication links and patterns between and within emergency department (ED) practitioner types.
Methods |
This is a prospective, observational study of emergency physician and nursing staff communication patterns in an academic ED using link analysis techniques. Twenty ED staff members were observed in the pediatric and adult acute areas of the ED, including attending physicians, residents, nurses, and charge nurses. Data were recorded for each communication event, including duration, mode, partner, location, and interruptions. Because this study was intended to focus on professionally related communication between staff, social interactions and direct patient interactions were excluded. Frequency percentage and duration were calculated for each measure, and link analysis graphs were prepared to assist in interpretation of the data.
Results |
One thousand six hundred sixty-five total communication events were recorded during a total of 39 hours 12 minutes of observation. Face-to-face communication was the most common mode. Communication links and patterns were described and graphically represented using a link analysis technique. Communication gaps were found between ambulance providers and the providers who would ultimately take care of the patient during their ED stay. Attending physicians communicated often despite caring for separate patients, and the charge nurse seemed to be the hub for communication, linking ED personnel with non-ED staff. In the adult area, interruption rates ranged from 6.9 per hour (attending physician) to 0.5 per hour (bedside nurse), and in the pediatric area they ranged from 3.6 per hour (attending physician) to 0.3 (bedside nurse).
Conclusion |
Distinct patterns are identified. These results will be helpful in designing future communication adjuncts in the ED.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Supervising editor: Robert L. Wears, MD, MS |
|
| Author contributions: RJF and AMB conceived the study, designed the study, obtained research funding, and supervised the conduct of the study and data collection. RJF and MS undertook recruitment of ED staff member participants. MS performed all observations and entered the data. AMB and MS managed the data. All investigators participated in the analysis, and AMB provided statistical oversight. RJF drafted the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. MS designed the figures and tables under the supervision of RJF and AMB. RJF takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. |
|
| Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that may create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. Support was provided for this study by the Ronald McDonald House Children’s Charities Research Fund. At the time of the study, Dr. Bisantz and Ms. Sunm were partially supported by the National Science Foundation (grant no. IIE9984079); and Dr. Fairbanks, by the NIH (1R41NR009592) and AHRQ (1U18HS015818). |
|
| Reprints not available from the authors. |
Vol 50 - N° 4
P. 396-406 - octobre 2007 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
