Peroral transgastric organ resection: a feasibility study in pigs - 17/08/11
Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Abstract |
Background |
The feasibility of peroral transgastric peritoneoscopy, liver biopsy, and tubal ligation has been demonstrated in prior animal studies. This approach has the potential to reduce postoperative morbidity.
Objective |
To explore the technical challenges and complications of performing a transgastric organ resection.
Design |
Two-week animal survival study.
Interventions |
Five female Yorkshire pigs underwent peroral transgastric partial hysterectomy. With the animals under general anesthesia, a sterile esophageal overtube was placed and a gastric antibiotic lavage was performed. Subsequently, a needle-knife and through-the-scope dilating balloon were used to make an anterior gastric wall incision through which a therapeutic gastroscope was advanced into the peritoneal cavity. Endoscopes and instruments previously had been disinfected in a 2.4% glutaraldehyde bath or were disposable. An endoloop and polypectomy snare were used to resect a portion of the uterus, which was removed through the mouth. Gastric incision closure was attempted with endoclips. After 2 weeks of observation, necropsy was performed.
Results |
Transgastric partial hysterectomy was performed on all 5 animals. One animal became lethargic and febrile, so necropsy was performed on day 4. An incompletely closed gastric incision and suppurative peritonitis were found. A second animal developed a fever; necropsy performed on day 14 revealed a gastric abscess at the incision site and scattered abdominal pus. No complications were encountered in the 3 remaining animals, and necropsy revealed well-healed gastric incisions and no evidence of peritonitis.
Conclusion |
Endoscopic transgastric partial hysterectomy is technically feasible in a porcine model. Strict sterility seems mandatory but cannot always be assured. Incomplete closure of the gastric incision may lead to significant complications.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Drs. Wagh and Merrifield contributed equally to this work. This work was supported by the Division of Gastroenterology funds, Brigham and Women’s Hospital. The authors do not have any conflicts of interest pertaining to this work. |
Vol 63 - N° 4
P. 693-697 - avril 2006 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?