Pararectus approach vs. Stoppa approach for the treatment of acetabular fractures – a comparison of approach-related complications and operative outcome parameters from the German Pelvic Registry - 12/06/22
, Björn Röhm b, Christof Audretsch a, Ulrich Stöckle c, Andreas Höch d, Tina Histing a, Fabian M. Stuby e, Alexander Trulson e, Steven C. Herath aWorking Group on Pelvic Fractures of the German Trauma Society
Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
Articolo gratuito.
Si connetta per beneficiarne
Abstract |
Purpose |
The Pararectus approach has been introduced as an alternative anterior approach to the Stoppa approach in acetabular surgery. There is no evidence which approach should be preferred, especially regarding approach-related complications. Therefore, aim of this registry study was to compare the Pararectus approach to the Stoppa approach regarding complications and quality of reduction.
Methods |
Patients from the German Pelvic Registry with a surgically treated acetabular fracture, either through the Pararectus approach or the Stoppa approach, were analyzed or compared regarding demographic, clinical and operative parameters.
Results |
In total, 384 patients with an acetabular fracture received a surgical procedure with either the Pararectus approach (n=120) or the Stoppa approach (n=264). There were no differences between the two groups regarding demographic parameters and fracture pattern. The overall complication rate (35.0% vs. 31.4%), the mortality rate (5.0% vs. 3.0%) and the osteosynthesis-associated complication rate (5.8% vs. 4.2%) tended to be higher in the Pararectus group with no statistical significance. There were significantly more anatomical reductions in the Pararectus group (56% vs. 43%; p=0.01). However, operation time was significantly longer in the Pararectus group (255±125 vs. 205±103 minutes; p<0.001).
Conclusion |
Despite a longer operation time, the Pararectus approach and the Stoppa approach are equivalently applicable for the treatment of acetabular fractures regarding complication rates and quality of reduction.
Level of evidence |
III, retrospective comparative study.
Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.Keywords : Pelvis, Pelvic fracture, Surgical site infection, Neurovascular injury, Anterior pelvic approaches
Mappa
Vol 108 - N° 4
Articolo 103275- Giugno 2022 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente
- Variability in rod to bone distance needed in pelvic subcutaneous internal fixation to avoid nerve compression: A tridimensional population-based study
- Kevin Perry, Brad Chauvin, Drayton Daily, Clarence J. Kee, Massimo Max Morandi, R. Shane Barton, Patrick O‘Neal, Bryan Saffell, Cole Dewitt, Luke Cranford, Giovanni F. Solitro
- Clinical and radiological outcomes of antegrade posterior column screw fixation of the acetabulum
- Guillaume Cavalié, Mehdi Boudissa, Gaël Kerschbaumer, Olivier seurat, Sébastien Ruatti, Jérôme Tonetti
Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.