Suscribirse

Is coracoclavicular stabilisation alone sufficient for the endoscopic treatment of severe acromioclavicular joint dislocation (Rockwood types III, IV, and V)? - 24/11/15

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.09.003 
J. Barth a, , F. Duparc b, K. Andrieu a, M. Duport c, B. Toussaint j, S. Bertiaux b, P. Clavert d, O. Gastaud e, N. Brassart f, E. Beaudouin g, P. De Mourgues h, D. Berne i, J. Bahurel j, N. Najihi k, P. Boyer l, B. Faivre m, A. Meyer n, G. Nourissat o, S. Poulain p, F. Bruchou q, J.-F. Ménard r

the French Society of Arthroscopy (SFA)

a Centre ostéo-articulaire des cèdres, parc Sud-Galaxie, 5, rue des Tropiques, Echirolles, France 
b Centre hospitalier universitaire de Rouen, Rouen, France 
c Médipôle Garonne, Toulouse, France 
d Service de chirurgie de l’épaule et du coude, CCOM, CHRU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France 
e Institut universitaire de l’appareil locomoteur et du sport, hôpital Pasteur 2, CHU de Nice, Nice, France 
f Clinique de Cagne-sur-Mer, Cagne-sur-Mer, France 
g Centre hospitalier régional de Chambéry, Chambéry, France 
h Médipôle de Savoie, Chambéry, France 
i Clinique Kennedy, Montélimar, France 
j Clinique Générale d’Annecy, Annecy, France 
k Centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France 
l Hôpital universitaire Xavier-Bichat, Paris, France 
m Hôpital universitaire Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt, France 
n CMC Paris V, Paris, France 
o Chirurgie de l’épaule, groupe Maussins, 67, rue de Romainville, Paris, France 
p Polyclinique du Plateau, Bezons, France 
q Hôpital privé de l’ouest parisien, Trappes, France 
r Unité biostatistique du CHU de Rouen, Rouen, France 

Corresponding author at: Centre ostéo-articulaire des cèdres, parc Sud-Galaxie, 5, rue des Tropiques, 38130 Echirolles, France.

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Abstract

Background

The primary objective was to evaluate correlations linking anatomical to functional outcomes after endoscopically assisted repair of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation (ACJD).

Hypothesis

Combined acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular stabilisation improves radiological outcomes compared to coracoclavicular stabilisation alone.

Material and methods

A prospective multicentre study was performed. Clinical outcome measures were pain intensity on a visual analogue scale (VAS), subjective functional impairment (QuickDASH score), and Constant's score. Anatomical outcomes were assessed on standard radiographs (anteroposterior view of the acromioclavicular girdle and bilateral axillary views) obtained preoperatively and postoperatively and on postoperative dynamic radiographs taken as described by Tauber et al.

Results

Of 116 patients with acute ACJD included in the study, 48% had type III, 30% type IV, and 22% type V ACJD according to the Rockwood classification. Coracoclavicular stabilisation was achieved using a double endobutton in 93% of patients, and concomitant acromioclavicular stabilisation was performed in 50% of patients. The objective functional outcome was good, with an unweighted Constant's score85/100 and a subjective QuickDASH functional disability score10 in 75% of patients. The radiographic analysis showed significant improvements from the preoperative to the 1-year postoperative values in the vertical plane (decrease in the coracoclavicular ratio from 214 to 128%, p=10−6) and in the horizontal plane (decrease in posterior displacement from 4 to 0mm, p=5×10−5). The anatomical outcome correlated significantly with the functional outcome (absolute R value=0.19 and p=0.045). We found no statistically significant differences across the various types of constructs used. Intra-operative control of the acromioclavicular joint did not improve the result. Implantation of a biological graft significantly improved both the anatomical outcome in the vertical plane (p=0.04) and acromioclavicular stabilisation in the horizontal plane (p=0.02). The coracoclavicular ratio on the anteroposterior radiograph was adversely affected by a longer time from injury to surgery (p=0.02) and by a higher body mass index (BMI) (p=0.006). High BMI also had a negative effect on the difference in the distance separating the anterior edge of the acromion from the anterior edge of the clavicle between the injured and uninjured sides, as assessed on the axillary views (p=0.009).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that acute ACJD requires stabilisation in both planes, i.e., at the coracoclavicular junction and at the acromioclavicular joint. Coracoclavicular stabilisation alone is not sufficient, regardless of the type of implant used. Implantation of a biological graft should be considered when the time from injury to surgery is longer than 10days. The weight of the upper limb should be taken into account, with 6weeks of immobilisation to unload the construct in patients who have high BMI values.

Level of evidence

II, prospective non-randomised comparative study.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Acromioclavicular joint disruption, Acute, Rockwood types III-IV-V, Arthroscopic stabilisation


Esquema


© 2015  Elsevier Masson SAS. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 101 - N° 8S

P. S297-S303 - décembre 2015 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Reliability of radiographic measurements for acromioclavicular joint separations
  • O. Gastaud, J.-L. Raynier, F. Duparc, L. Baverel, K. Andrieu, N. Tarissi, J. Barth
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Prognostic factors to succeed in surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular dislocations
  • J. Barth, F. Duparc, L. Baverel, J. Bahurel, B. Toussaint, S. Bertiaux, P. Clavert, O. Gastaud, N. Brassart, E. Beaudouin, P. De Mourgues, D. Berne, M. Duport, N. Najihi, P. Boyer, B. Faivre, A. Meyer, G. Nourissat, S. Poulain, F. Bruchou, J.F. Ménard, the Société Française d’Arthroscopie

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.