Suscribirse

Differentiating infectious and noninfectious ventilator-associated complications: A new challenge - 28/05/16

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.12.032 
John C. O'Horo, MD, MPH a, b, c, * , Rahul Kashyap, MBBS b, d, Ronaldo Sevilla Berrios, MD a, d, Vitaly Herasevich, MD, PhD b, d, Priya Sampathkumar, MD c
a Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 
b Multidisciplinary Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 
c Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 
d Division of Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 

*Address correspondence to John C. O'Horo, MD, MPH, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 N 1st St, Rochester, MN 55901. (J.C. O'Horo).Department of MedicineDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicineMayo Clinic200 N 1st StRochesterMN55901

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to develop an electronic search algorithm which reliably differentiates infectious and noninfectious ventilator-associated events (VAEs). This was a retrospective cohort study used to derive a predictive model. It took place at a tertiary care hospital campus.

Methods

Participants included all ventilated patients who met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Health Safety Network definitions for VAEs between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013. There were 164 patients who experienced 185 VAEs in the study period.

Results

The most predictive variables were fever 2 days before VAE onset, oxygenation changes, and appearance of respiratory secretions. No other variable, including laboratory tests, radiologic findings, and vital sign values, reached statistical significance. A multivariate regression model was constructed, with 68% sensitivity and 75% specificity (receiver operator characteristic area under the curve [ROC-AUC], 0.83). This was modestly better than the clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS), which had sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 59%, and ROC-AUC of 0.60.

Conclusions

Although diagnosis of VAEs remains challenging, our data indicate that clinical signs and symptoms of a VAE may be present up to 2 days before they screen positive. Sputum, fever, and oxygenation requirements all were indicative, but aggregate models failed to create a sensitive and specific model for differentiation of VAEs. The existing clinical tool, the CPIS, is also insufficiently sensitive and specific. Further research is needed to create a clinically viable tool for differentiating VAE types at the bedside.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Key Words : Ventilator-associated event, ventilator-associated pneumonia, electronic search algorithm, clinical pulmonary infection score, health care–acquired infection, nosocomial


Esquema


 Funding/Support: Supported by Clinical and Translational Science Activity Grant UL1 TR000135 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, a component of the National Institutes of Health.
 Disclaimer: The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
 Conflicts of Interest: None to report.


© 2016  Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 44 - N° 6

P. 661-665 - juin 2016 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Assessing patient and caregiver understanding of and satisfaction with the use of contact isolation
  • Paul Chittick, Shalini Koppisetty, Lia Lombardo, Akash Vadhavana, Ashish Solanki, Kristi Cumming, Vincent Agboto, Cindy Karl, Jeffrey Band
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Evaluation of an ethical method aimed at improving hygiene rules compliance in dental practice
  • Damien Offner, Marion Strub, Christelle Rebert, Anne-Marie Musset

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.