Suscribirse

Application of the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis (Sepsis-3) Classification: a retrospective population-based cohort study - 09/10/17

Doi : 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30117-2 
John P Donnelly, MSPH a, b, Monika M Safford, ProfMD d, e, Nathan I Shapiro, MD f, g, John W Baddley, ProfMD c, Henry E Wang, ProfMD a,
a Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA 
b Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA 
c Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA 
d Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA 
e Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA 
f Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 
g Department of Emergency Medicine and Center for Vascular Biology Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA 

* Correspondence to: Prof Henry E Wang, Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA Correspondence to: Prof Henry E Wang Department of Emergency Medicine School of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham AL 35249 USA

Summary

Background

The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) present clinical criteria for the classification of patients with sepsis. We investigated incidence and long-term outcomes of patients diagnosed with these classifications, which are currently unknown.

Methods

We did a retrospective analysis using data from 30 239 participants from the USA who were aged at least 45 years and enrolled in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort. Patients were enrolled between Jan 25, 2003, and Oct 30, 2007, and we identified hospital admissions from Feb 5, 2003, to Dec 31, 2012, and applied three classifications: infection and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, elevated sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score from Sepsis-3, and elevated quick SOFA (qSOFA) score from Sepsis-3. We estimated incidence during the study period, in-hospital mortality, and 1-year mortality.

Findings

Of 2593 first infection events, 1526 met SIRS criteria, 1080 met SOFA criteria, and 378 met qSOFA criteria. Incidence was 8·2 events (95% CI 7·8–8·7) per 1000 person-years for SIRS, 5·8 events (5·4–6·1) per 1000 person-years for SOFA, and 2·0 events (1·8–2·2) per 1000 person-years for qSOFA. In-hospital mortality was higher for patients with an elevated qSOFA score (67 [23%] of 295 patients died) than for those with an elevated SOFA score (125 [13%] of 960 patients died) or who met SIRS criteria (128 [9%] of 1392 patients died). Mortality at 1 year after discharge was also highest for patients with an elevated qSOFA score (29·4 deaths [95% CI 22·3–38·7] per 100 person-years) compared with those with an elevated SOFA score (22·6 deaths [19·2–26·6] per 100 person-years) or those who met SIRS criteria (14·7 deaths [12·5–17·2] per 100 person-years).

Interpretation

SIRS, SOFA, and qSOFA classifications identified different incidences and mortality. Our findings support the use of the SOFA and qSOFA classifications to identify patients with infection who are at elevated risk of poor outcomes. These classifications could be used in future epidemiological assessments and studies of patients with infection.

Funding

National Institute for Nursing Research, National Center for Research Resources, and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


© 2017  Elsevier Ltd. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 17 - N° 6

P. 661-670 - juin 2017 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Characteristics and survival of patients with Ebola virus infection, malaria, or both in Sierra Leone: a retrospective cohort study
  • Matthew Waxman, Adam R Aluisio, Soham Rege, Adam C Levine
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Helminths in organ transplantation
  • Andrew J R Cooper, Shamik Dholakia, Celia V Holland, Peter J Friend

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.