Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) rhythms have been traditionally divided into shockable [ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF)] and nonshockable [(asystole (ASY)/pulseless electrical activity (PEA)] rhythms. It is unclear if the specific rhythm has implications on patient management and outcomes. We evaluated 1,433 patients who were admitted with SCA from 2000 to 2012 and were discharged alive. Of those, 1,123 patients had a recorded initial SCA rhythm. Subjects included were >18 years of age, and without an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in place at the time of the event. The likelihood of receiving an ICD for each SCA rhythm and the time to death were analyzed. Of the overall cohort of 1,123 SCA survivors (age of 62 ± 15 years; 39.2% women; 56.3% in-hospital SCA; 83% white; 67% coronary artery disease), 355 (31.6%) received an ICD, and 493 (43.9%) died over a mean follow-up of 3.8 ± 3.2 years. Patients with VF (n = 254, 43.6%) or VT (n = 83, 43.9%) were more likely to receive ICD therapy compared with those with ASY (n = 9, 5.3%) or PEA (n = 9, 4.8%; p <0.001). All-cause mortality was lower in VF patients compared with the other groups (p <0.0001). ICD therapy was associated with lower risk of death in the VF group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61 [0.45 to 0.83]; p = 0.002) and strong trends toward less mortality in patients with VT (HR 0.64 [0.40 to 1.03]; p = 0.07) and ASY (HR 0.39 [0.12 to 1.31]; p = 0.13) but not in those with PEA (HR 0.93 [0.39 to 2.23]; p = 0.88). In conclusion, long-term survival in post-SCA patients is influenced by initial SCA rhythm. Although SCA survivors with shockable rhythms were more likely to receive ICDs, the ICD was associated with lower risk of death in most patients, including those with ASY. In conclusion, our data suggest that a more detailed SCA rhythm classification has important implications to patient management and long-term survival in this population.