Suscribirse

Statewide Pediatric Facility Recognition Programs and Their Association with Pediatric Readiness in Emergency Departments in the United States - 20/02/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.10.017 
Travis M. Whitfill, MPH 1, , Katherine E. Remick, MD 2, 3, 4, 5, Lenora M. Olson, PhD, MA 6, Rachel Richards, MStat 6, Kathleen M. Brown, MD 7, 8, Marc A. Auerbach, MD, MSci 1, Marianne Gausche-Hill, MD 9, 10, 11
1 Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 
2 Office of the Medical Director, Austin-Travis County EMS System, Austin, TX 
3 Dell Medical School at the University of Texas, Austin, TX 
4 San Marcos/Hays County EMS System, San Marcos, TX 
5 EMS for Children Innovation and Improvement Center, Houston, TX 
6 National Emergency Medical Services for Children Data Analysis Resource Center, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 
7 Department of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 
8 Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC 
9 Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 
10 Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 
11 Emergency Medical Services Agency, Department of Health Services, Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA 

Reprint requests: Travis M. Whitfill, MPH, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, 100 York Street, Suite 1F, New Haven, CT 06510.Department of PediatricsYale University School of Medicine100 York StreetSuite 1FNew HavenCT06510

Abstract

Objective

To describe the relationship between statewide pediatric facility recognition (PFR) programs and pediatric readiness in emergency departments (EDs) in the US.

Study design

Data were extracted from the 2013 National Pediatric Readiness Project assessment (4083 EDs). Pediatric readiness was assessed using the weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS) based on a 100-point scale. Descriptive statistics were used to compare WPRS between recognized and nonrecognized EDs and between states with or without a PFR program. A linear mixed model with WPRS was used to evaluate state PFR programs on pediatric readiness.

Results

Eight states were identified with a PFR program. EDs in states with a PFR program had a higher WPRS compared with states without a PFR program (overall a 9.1-point higher median WPRS; P < .001); EDs recognized in a PFR program had a 21.7-point higher median WPRS compared with nonrecognized EDs (P < .001); and between states with a statewide PFR program, there was high variability of participation within the states. We found state-level PFR programs predicted a higher WPRS compared with states without a PFR program (β = 5.49; 95% CI 2.76-8.23).

Conclusions

Statewide PFR programs are based on national guidelines and identify those EDs that adhere to a standard level of readiness for children. These statewide PFR initiatives are associated with higher pediatric readiness. As scalable strategies are needed to improve emergency care for children, our study suggests that statewide PFR programs may be one way to improve pediatric readiness and underscores the need for further implementation and evaluation.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : pediatric readiness, emergency medicine, EMSC, facility recognition

Abbreviations : ED, EMSC, FRP, HRSA, NPRP, PFR, WPRS


Esquema


 Additional funding and disclosure information is available at www.jpeds.com.


© 2019  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 218

P. 210 - mars 2020 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Twenty-Four-Hour Movement Guidelines and Body Weight in Youth
  • Xihe Zhu, Sean Healy, Justin A. Haegele, Freda Patterson
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Pediatric Heart Failure: An Evolving Public Health Concern
  • Stephanie J. Nakano, Shelley D. Miyamoto, Jack F. Price, Joseph W. Rossano, Antonio G. Cabrera

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.