Suscribirse

Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study - 24/09/20

Doi : 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30457-6 
Adam J Kucharski, PhD a, , Petra Klepac, PhD a, b, Andrew J K Conlan, PhD c, Stephen M Kissler, PhD d, Maria L Tang, MMath b, Hannah Fry, PhD e, Julia R Gog, PhD b, W John Edmunds, PhD a
on behalf of the

CMMID COVID-19 working group

Jon C Emery, Graham Medley, James D Munday, Timothy W Russell, Quentin J Leclerc, Charlie Diamond, Simon R Procter, Amy Gimma, Fiona Yueqian Sun, Hamish P Gibbs, Alicia Rosello, Kevin van Zandvoort, Stéphane Hué, Sophie R Meakin, Arminder K Deol, Gwen Knight, Thibaut Jombart, Anna M Foss, Nikos I Bosse, Katherine E Atkins, Billy J Quilty, Rachel Lowe, Kiesha Prem, Stefan Flasche, Carl A B Pearson, Rein M G J Houben, Emily S Nightingale, Akira Endo, Damien C Tully, Yang Liu, Julian Villabona-Arenas, Kathleen O’Reilly, Sebastian Funk, Rosalind M Eggo, Mark Jit, Eleanor M Rees, Joel Hellewell, Samuel Clifford, Christopher I Jarvis, Sam Abbott, Megan Auzenbergs, Nicholas G Davies, David Simons

a Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK 
b Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 
c Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 
d Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA 
e Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, London, UK 

* Correspondence to: Dr Adam J Kucharski, Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine London WC1E 7HT UK

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Summary

Background

The isolation of symptomatic cases and tracing of contacts has been used as an early COVID-19 containment measure in many countries, with additional physical distancing measures also introduced as outbreaks have grown. To maintain control of infection while also reducing disruption to populations, there is a need to understand what combination of measures—including novel digital tracing approaches and less intensive physical distancing—might be required to reduce transmission. We aimed to estimate the reduction in transmission under different control measures across settings and how many contacts would be quarantined per day in different strategies for a given level of symptomatic case incidence.

Methods

For this mathematical modelling study, we used a model of individual-level transmission stratified by setting (household, work, school, or other) based on BBC Pandemic data from 40 162 UK participants. We simulated the effect of a range of different testing, isolation, tracing, and physical distancing scenarios. Under optimistic but plausible assumptions, we estimated reduction in the effective reproduction number and the number of contacts that would be newly quarantined each day under different strategies.

Results

We estimated that combined isolation and tracing strategies would reduce transmission more than mass testing or self-isolation alone: mean transmission reduction of 2% for mass random testing of 5% of the population each week, 29% for self-isolation alone of symptomatic cases within the household, 35% for self-isolation alone outside the household, 37% for self-isolation plus household quarantine, 64% for self-isolation and household quarantine with the addition of manual contact tracing of all contacts, 57% with the addition of manual tracing of acquaintances only, and 47% with the addition of app-based tracing only. If limits were placed on gatherings outside of home, school, or work, then manual contact tracing of acquaintances alone could have an effect on transmission reduction similar to that of detailed contact tracing. In a scenario where 1000 new symptomatic cases that met the definition to trigger contact tracing occurred per day, we estimated that, in most contact tracing strategies, 15 000–41 000 contacts would be newly quarantined each day.

Interpretation

Consistent with previous modelling studies and country-specific COVID-19 responses to date, our analysis estimated that a high proportion of cases would need to self-isolate and a high proportion of their contacts to be successfully traced to ensure an effective reproduction number lower than 1 in the absence of other measures. If combined with moderate physical distancing measures, self-isolation and contact tracing would be more likely to achieve control of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 transmission.

Funding

Wellcome Trust, UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, European Commission, Royal Society, Medical Research Council.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


© 2020  The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 20 - N° 10

P. 1151-1160 - octobre 2020 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Household secondary attack rate of COVID-19 and associated determinants in Guangzhou, China: a retrospective cohort study
  • Qin-Long Jing, Ming-Jin Liu, Zhou-Bin Zhang, Li-Qun Fang, Jun Yuan, An-Ran Zhang, Natalie E Dean, Lei Luo, Meng-Meng Ma, Ira Longini, Eben Kenah, Ying Lu, Yu Ma, Neda Jalali, Zhi-Cong Yang, Yang Yang
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Changes in colistin resistance and mcr-1 abundance in Escherichia coli of animal and human origins following the ban of colistin-positive additives in China: an epidemiological comparative study
  • Yang Wang, Chunyan Xu, Rong Zhang, Yiqiang Chen, Yingbo Shen, Fupin Hu, Dejun Liu, Jiayue Lu, Yan Guo, Xi Xia, Junyao Jiang, Xueyang Wang, Yulin Fu, Lu Yang, Jiayi Wang, Juan Li, Chang Cai, Dandan Yin, Jie Che, Run Fan, Yongqiang Wang, Yan Qing, Yi Li, Kang Liao, Hui Chen, Mingxiang Zou, Liang Liang, Jin Tang, Zhangqi Shen, Shaolin Wang, Xiaorong Yang, Congming Wu, Shixin Xu, Timothy R Walsh, Jianzhong Shen

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.