Suscribirse

Clinical non-superiority of technology-assisted gait training with body weight support in patients with subacute stroke: A meta-analysis - 29/11/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.09.009 
Chih-Yang Hsu a, Yu-Hsuan Cheng a, Chien-Hung Lai b, Yen-Nung Lin a, c,
a Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wan-Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan 
b Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan 
c Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan 

Corresponding author at: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, 111 Hsing-Long Road, Section 3, Taipei 11696, Taiwan.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University111 Hsing-Long Road, Section 3Taipei 11696Taiwan

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.

Conéctese para beneficiarse!

Highlights

Technology-assisted gait training (TAGT) with body weight support usually provides high repetitions of task practice.
Evidence is insufficient to support the superiority of such TAGT over traditional training.
The connection between repetition and intensity of training should be reconsidered.
More direct evidence is needed to evaluate the benefit of high repetition during TAGT.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Abstract

Background

Technology-assisted gait training (TAGT) with body weight support (BWS) has been designed to provide high numbers of repetitions during stepping practice, but its benefits have been inconclusive.

Objective

We evaluated the superiority of TAGT over conventional overground training (COT) to judge the clinical benefits.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases from their earliest record to July 1, 2019 and included randomized controlled trials of TAGT with BWS, such as robot-assisted gait training and body weight-supported treadmill training, for treating walking disability in patients within 6months after stroke. We conducted a meta-analysis of the outcomes motor impairment, mobility capacity, walking speed, endurance and fitness, balance, and activities of daily living as well as subgroup analyses of initial ambulatory ability and stroke duration.

Results

Among 14robotics and 10body weight-supported treadmill studies included for review, 23studies involving 1452participants contributed to the meta-analysis. We found no significant standardized mean differences between TAGT and COT (P>0.05) across all outcome categories in the robotics subgroup, the body weight-supported treadmill subgroup, or both subgroups combined, for both the short and long term. Further subgroup analyses also revealed non-significant standardized mean differences (P>0.05) across all outcomes in the subgroups initially ambulatory, non-ambulatory, or stroke duration less than 3 months.

Conclusions

TAGT with BWS was not superior to COT in improving post-stroke recovery in patients with subacute stroke. Strategies other than simply increasing the repetitions by external assistance may be considered to augment the treatment effects of TAGT.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Stroke rehabilitation, Robotics, Body-weight-support, Treadmill, Gait


Esquema


© 2019  Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 63 - N° 6

P. 535-542 - novembre 2020 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Effects of robotic gait training after stroke: A meta-analysis
  • Geoffroy Moucheboeuf, Romain Griffier, David Gasq, Bertrand Glize, Laurent Bouyer, Patrick Dehail, Helene Cassoudesalle
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Sleep disorders in aging polio survivors: A systematic review
  • Antoine Léotard, Jonathan Lévy, Sarah Hartley, Avril Pages, François Genet, Frédéric Lofaso, Hélène Prigent, Maria Antonia Quera-Salva

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.