Suscribirse

Continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilation improve survival in a neonatal swine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest - 09/10/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.009 
Afrodite Aggelina, MSc a, 1, Ioannis Pantazopoulos, MD, PhD b, 1, George Giokas, MD, PhD a, Athanasios Chalkias, MD, PhD c, Georgios Mavrovounis, MD b, , Apostolos Papalois, MD, PhD d, e , Alexandros Douvanas, MSc a, Theodoros Xanthos, MD, PhD e, Nicoletta Iacovidou, MD, PhD f, g
a National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, 11527, Greece 
b University of Thessaly, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, 41110 Larissa, Greece 
c University of Thessaly, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, 41110 Larissa, Greece 
d Experimental, Educational and Research Center ELPEN, Greece 
e European University Cyprus, School of Medicine, 1516, Cyprus 
f National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, 11527, Greece 
g Department of Neonatology, Aretaieio Hospital, 11528, Greece 

Corresponding author.

Abstract

Background

Guidelines for neonatal resuscitation recommend a 3:1 compression to ventilation ratio. However, this recommendation is based on expert opinion and consensus rather than strong scientific evidence. Our primary aim was to assess whether continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilations would increase return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate and survival compared to the 3:1 chest compression to ventilation ratio.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, laboratory study. Twenty male Landrace-Large White pigs, aged 1–4 days with an average weight 1.650 ± 228.3 g were asphyxiated and left untreated until heart rate was less than 60 bpm or mean arterial pressure was below 15 mmHg. Animals were then randomly assigned to receive either continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilations (n = 10), or standard (3:1) chest compression to ventilation ratio (n = 10). Heart rate and arterial pressure were assessed every 30 s during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) until ROSC or asystole. All animals with ROSC were monitored for 4 h.

Results

Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) at 30 s of CPR was significantly higher in the experimental group (45.7 ± 16.9 vs. 21.8 ± 6 mmHg, p < 0.001) and remained significantly elevated throughout the experiment. End-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) was also significantly higher in the experimental group throughout the experiment (23.4 ± 5.6 vs. 14.7 ± 5.9 mmHg, p < 0.001). ROSC was observed in six (60%) animals treated with 3:1 compression to ventilation ratio and nine (90%) animals treated with continuous chest compressions and asynchronous ventilation (p = 0.30). Time to ROSC was significantly lower in the experimental group (30 (30−30) vs. 60 (60–60) sec, p = 0.021). Of note, 7 (77.8%) animals in the experimental group and 1 (16.7%) animal in the control group achieved ROSC after 30 s (0.02). At 4 h, 2 (20%) animals survived in the control group compared to 7 (70%) animals in the experimental group (p = 0.022).

Conclusion

Continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilations significantly improved CPP, ETCO2, time to ROSC, ROSC at 30 s and survival in a porcine model of neonatal resuscitation.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Highlights

The compression to ventilation ratio in neonatal CPR is based on expert opinion.
Continuous chest compressions increased CPP and ETCO2 during neonatal CPR.
Continuous chest compressions increased time to ROSC and survival in our model.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Neonatal resuscitation, Asphyxial cardiac arrest, Continuous chest compressions, Survival, ROSC

Abbreviations : ILCOR, CPR, CPP, ROSC, FiO2, ETCO2, NLS, ABGs, IQR, ERC, HR, MAP, DAP, SAP


Esquema


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 48

P. 60-66 - octobre 2021 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Comparison of qSOFA, SIRS, and NEWS scoring systems for diagnosis, mortality, and morbidity of sepsis in emergency department
  • Ali Fuat Oduncu, Güçlü Selahattin K?yan, Sercan Yalç?nl?
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • How does the side of approach impact the force delivered during external chest compression?
  • Jui-Yi Tsou, Chia-Lung Kao, Ming-Yuan Hong, Chih-Jan Chang, Fong-Chin Su, Chih-Hsien Chi

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.