Does intraoperative 3D navigation improve SpineJack vertebral augmentation in thoracic and lumbar compression fracture? - 29/10/21
, Pierre Girard a, Gaël Kerschbaumer a, Sébastien Ruatti a, Jérôme Tonetti a, b
Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
Artículo gratuito.
Conéctese para beneficiarse!
Abstract |
Introduction |
The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of navigation on the positioning of the SpineJack implant in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar compression fractures.
Methods |
Between January 2018 and December 2019, all patients operated on for thoracic or lumbar fracture using the SpineJack device in stand-alone were included in this single-center study. The positioning of the SpineJack implant was analyzed on axial CT views by measuring the angle between the axis of the pedicle and the axis of the final implant. The relationships between implant positioning and the use of navigation or fluoroscopy, pedicle dimensions and levels of injury were analyzed. Surgical time, radiation exposure, radiological findings and complications were assessed.
Results |
One hundred patients were included, for 103 fractured vertebrae and a total of 205 implants, 148 placed under standard fluoroscopy and 57 with the Surgivisio navigation system. For pedicle diameters≥5mm (165 implants), the positioning of the implant relative to the axis of the pedicle was significantly better in the navigation group: 2°±1.4° (range, 0–7°) in the fluoroscopy group versus 1.2°±1.1° (range, 0–5°) in the navigation group (p=0.04). There were no significant differences in reduction of vertebral kyphosis angle or mean operating time. Dose area product (DAP) was significantly higher with navigation: 4.43Gy.cm2 versus 0.47Gy.cm2 (p<0.001) and dose to the surgeon significantly lower: 0.5 versus 1.6μSv (p<0.001). No difference was found regarding complications. Subgroup analysis showed significantly greater operative time and patient irradiation in the fluoroscopy group when pedicle diameter was less than 5mm.
Conclusion |
This study demonstrates the interest of navigation for positioning the SpineJack implant with respect to the pedicle axis in vertebrae with pedicle diameter≥5mm. This study also confirmed the reliability of navigation and lower radiation dose to the surgeon, regardless of the fracture level. Navigation reduced operating time and patient irradiation for vertebrae with pedicle diameter<5mm.
Level of evidence |
IV; retrospective study.
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Keywords : SpineJack, Vertebral augmentation, Vertebral compression fracture, Sagittal correction, Navigation, Radiation exposure, Surgivisio
Esquema
Vol 107 - N° 7
Artículo 103028- novembre 2021 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente
- Morbidity and clinicoradiological outcomes of anterior lumbar arthrodesis using tantalum intervertebral implants
- Yann Breton, Jonathan Lebhar, Antoine Bourgoin, Pierre Kriegel, Patrick Chatellier, Mickaël Ropars
- Incidence and risk factors of lateral cage migration occurred after the first-stage lateral lumbar interbody fusion surgery
- Hao Li, Zheng kuan Xu, Ning Zhang, Fangcai Li, Qixin Chen
Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.