Due to poor bone quality and complexity, some fractures are difficult to treat, with high risk of failure. Moreover, general health is often poor in elderly patients with multiple comorbidity and poor compliance, necessitating perfect first-line management to avoid re-operation. The armamentarium comprises specific internal fixation implants and also complementary methods such as autologous, homologous or heterologous bone graft or bone substitutes with varying mechanical and biological characteristics. Associating these options is what is mean by “augmented fixation”. The present review of augmented osteosynthesis addresses the following questions: What are the characteristics of fragility fractures? Fragility fracture is caused by low-energy trauma on bone with poor structural quality and low mineral density. Treatment aims to enable early mobilization and weight-bearing while avoiding mechanical failure of fixation. Prolonged bedrest, loss of mobility and surgical revision are aggravating and sometimes fatal factors in these fragile patients. What are the biological techniques of fixation augmentation in fragility fracture? Autologous or homologous bone graft are the most widely used biological augmentation techniques. They fill spaces and promote osteoconduction and consolidation. Some bone-like phosphocalcic structures are opening up promising lines of research. What are the non-biological techniques of fixation augmentation in fragility fracture? Hydroxyapatite, phosphocalcic cement and acrylic cement are the most widely used synthetic materials. Biological and mechanical effects are variable according to composition, requiring specific implementation. What are the mechanical techniques of fixation augmentation in fragility fracture? There is at present no consensus as to the augmentation techniques to be applied in fragility fracture. Cerclage or complementary plating, or external fixation associated to internal fixation are possibilities. However, the literature consists only of small series reporting surgical techniques specific to a given surgeon or team. When and how should osteosynthesis for fragility fracture be augmented? The choice of augmentation depends on fracture location, comminution, available material and local experience. The more severe the fracture, the more complex the fixation. The approach needs to be adapted to the preoperative planning and the associated mechanical means (plate, complementary cerclage) and prosthetic replacement should be considered in certain joint fractures or fractures close to load-bearing surfaces.

V; expert opinion.