Suscribirse

Current Practice Patterns in the Surgical Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia - 29/05/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.urology.2023.02.025 
Tenny R. Zhang 1, 2, Samantha L. Thorogood 1, 2, Christina Sze 1, 2, Robert Fisch 1, 2, Bilal Chughtai 2, Alexis Te 2, Richard K. Lee 2, Jim C. Hu 2,
1 Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 
2 Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY 

Address correspondence to: Jim C. Hu, M.D., M.P.H., Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 East 68th Street, Starr 900, New York, NY 10065.Department of UrologyWeill Cornell Medical College525 East 68th Street, Starr 900New YorkNY10065

Abstract

Objective

To use American Board of Urology (ABU) case log data to elucidate practice patterns for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery. Several surgical modalities have been introduced in recent decades causing significant practice variation.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed ABU case logs from 2008-2021 to assess trends in BPH surgery. We created logistic regression models to identify surgeon-sided factors associated with utilization of each surgical modality.

Results

We identified 6,632 urologists who logged 73,884 surgeries for BPH. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was the most commonly performed BPH surgery in all but 1 year, and odds of performing a TURP increased year-over-year (OR 1.055, 95% CI [1.013,1.098], P = .010). The use of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) did not change over time. HoLEP was more likely to be performed by urologists with higher BPH surgical volume (OR 1.017, CI [1.013, 1.021], P < .001) and with endourology subspecialization (OR 2.410, CI [1.45, 4.01], P = .001). Prostatic urethral lift (PUL) utilization increased significantly since its introduction in 2015 (OR 1.663, CI [1.540, 1.796], P < .001). PUL currently comprises over one third of all BPH surgeries logged.

Conclusion

In the face of newer technologies, TURP remains the most common surgery for BPH in the United States. PUL has been rapidly adopted while HoLEP comprises a consistent minority of cases. Surgeon age, patient age, and urologist subspecialization were associated with use of certain BPH surgical approaches.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


 Disclosures: Jim C. Hu receives research support from the Frederick J. and Theresa Dow Wallace Fund of the New York Community Trust. Jim C. Hu also receives salary support from NIH R01 CA241758, NIH R01CA259173, R01 CA273031, Prostate Cancer Foundation, PCORI CER-2019C1-15682 and CER-2019C2-17372. Bilal Chughtai is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Olympus. Alexis Te is consultant for Procept. The remaining authors report no further disclosures related to this work. No funding provided for manuscript development.


© 2023  Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 175

P. 157-162 - mai 2023 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Systematic Template Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Approaches
  • Shulin Wu, Adam S. Feldman, Michelle M. Kim, Sharron X. Lin, Kristine M. Cornejo, Mukesh G. Harisinghani, Douglas M. Dahl, Chin-Lee Wu
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • V.I.P. Score: A Comprehensive Grading System to Predict Difficulty of HoLEP Procedure for Small-to-Moderate Sized Prostate (<120 mL)
  • Ke Liu, Ye Yan, Yichang Hao, Fan Zhang, Chunlei Xiao, Lulin Ma

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.