Suscribirse

Highlighting Gender Differences in RLS: Analysis of Gender in Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgical Volume in Urology Vs Other Subspecialties - 29/05/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.urology.2022.11.055 
Natalie Passarelli a, b, Faizanahmed Munshi a, b, Borivoj Golijanin a, b, Rebecca Ortiz b, Joshua Tanzer c, Simone Thavaseelan a, Elias Hyams a, b,
a The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 
b Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI 
c Lifespan Biostatistics Epidemiology Research Design Core, Providence, RI 

Address correspondence to: Elias Hyams, M.D., The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 164 Summit Ave, Providence, RI 02906.The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University164 Summit AveProvidenceRI02906

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the involvement of women surgeons in RLS over time and across fields. While women are an increasing proportion of the urological workforce, the overall percentage of women urologists remains low. As robotic/laparoscopic surgery (RLS) has become first-line for many surgical problems, we hypothesized that women in urology may have lower participation than other specialties.

Materials and Methods

We obtained country-wide data by surgeon from the Data.CMS.gov database for 2014-2019 for major RLS procedures in colorectal surgery, gynecology, thoracic surgery, and urology. Data were sorted by gender and CPT code. Temporal trends were assessed, and estimation was performed by exponential regression comparing means and rates of change between departments and surgeon genders.

Results

Surgeons across disciplines and genders showed increases in RLS volume over time (P <.05). There were significant differences between men and women surgeons between specialties in average number of surgeons (P <.0001) and rate of change over time (P = .0035). The difference of the rate of increase in the number of surgeons performing RLS between genders was significant for all disciplines, suggesting women were entering RLS surgery faster than men across specialties (P <.05).

Conclusion

There is a disparity in RLS procedure performance in men vs women across surgical disciplines. The greatest discrepancy in participation between genders existed in Urology, despite the field having a higher percentage of women physicians than other some subspecialties. Targeted action to address barriers to women surgeons’ participation in RLS will increase diversity of thought and improve clinical care.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


 Financial Disclosure: The authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests.


© 2023  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 175

P. 229-235 - mai 2023 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Endoscopic Laser Dissection Combined With Laparoscopic Pneumovesical Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Novel Technique and Case Report
  • Gengyu Han, Runlei Zhao, Ke Liu, Guoliang Wang, Xin Yang, Chunlei Xiao
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • EDITORIAL COMMENT
  • Ashley A. Foret, Megan E. Escott, Mary E. Westerman

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.