Suscribirse

Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 145 randomized controlled trials - 16/06/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2023.03.023 
Venkata S. Akshintala, MD 1, Kavin Kanthasamy, MD 1, Furqan A. Bhullar, MD 1, Christina J. Sperna Weiland, MD, PhD 2, Ayesha Kamal, MD 1, Bharati Kochar, MD 3, Merve Gurakar, MD 1, Saowanee Ngamruengphong, MD 1, Vivek Kumbhari, MD, PhD 1, Olaya I. Brewer-Gutierrez, MD 1, Anthony N. Kalloo, MD 1, Mouen A. Khashab, MD 1, Erwin-Jan M. van Geenen, MD, PhD 2, Vikesh K. Singh, MD, MSc 1,
1 Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA 
2 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands 
3 Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 

Reprint requests: Vikesh K. Singh, MD, MSc, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 E Monument St, Rm 428, Baltimore, MD 21205.Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine1830 E Monument StRm 428BaltimoreMD21205

Abstract

Background and Aims

The incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) largely remain unknown with changing trends in ERCP use, indication, and techniques. We sought to determine the incidence, severity, and mortality of PEP in consecutive and high-risk patients based on a systemic review and meta-analysis of patients in placebo and no-stent arms of randomized control trials (RCTs).

Methods

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from the inception of each database to June 2022 to identify full-text RCTs evaluating PEP prophylaxes. The incidence, severity, and mortality of PEP from the placebo or no-stent arms of RCTs were recorded for consecutive and high-risk patients. A random-effects meta-analysis for a proportions model was used to calculate PEP incidence, severity, and mortality.

Results

One hundred forty-five RCTs were found with 19,038 patients in the placebo or no-stent arms. The overall cumulative incidence of PEP was 10.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.3-11.3), predominantly among the academic centers conducting such RCTs. The cumulative incidences of severe PEP and mortality were .5% (95% CI, .3-.7) and .2% (95% CI, .08-.3), respectively, across 91 RCTs with 14,441 patients. The cumulative incidences of PEP and severe PEP were 14.1% (95% CI, 11.5-17.2) and .8% (95% CI, .4-1.6), respectively, with a mortality rate of .2% (95% CI, 0-.3) across 35 RCTs with 3733 patients at high risk of PEP. The overall trend for the incidence of PEP among patients randomized to placebo or no-stent arms of RCTs has remained unchanged from 1977 to 2022 (P = .48).

Conclusions

The overall incidence of PEP is 10.2% but is 14.1% among high-risk patients based on this systematic review of placebo or no-stent arms of 145 RCTs; this rate has not changed between 1977 and 2022. Severe PEP and mortality from PEP are relatively uncommon.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Graphical abstract




El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Abbreviations : PEP, RCT, SOD


Esquema


 DISCLOSURE: The following authors disclosed financial relationships: V. S. Akshintala: Consultant forOlympusand Abbvie; researchsupportfromBoston Scientificand Medtronic; co-founder of Origin Endoscopy. A. N. Kalloo: Equity holder in Apollo Endosurgery. M. A. Khashab: Advisory board member and consultant forBoston Scientific. E. J. M. van Geenen: Consultant for MTW Endoscopy; researchsupportfrom MTW Endoscopy, Tae Woong,Mylan, andOlympus. V. K. Singh: Consultant forAbbvieand Nestle HealthScience; researchsupportfrom Theraly and Orgenesis. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships.


© 2023  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 98 - N° 1

P. 1 - juillet 2023 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Instructions for authors
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Cold snare versus cold forceps polypectomy for endoscopic resection of diminutive polyps: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
  • Faisal Kamal, Muhammad Ali Khan, Wade Lee-Smith, Sachit Sharma, Ashu Acharya, Umer Farooq, Amit Agarwal, Muhammad Aziz, Justin Chuang, Anand Kumar, Alexander Schlachterman, David Loren, Thomas Kowalski, Douglas Adler

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.