Suscribirse

Consecutive Experience with Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in a High-Volume Australian Centre - 05/09/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.04.293 
Robert J. Puchalski, MBBS a, Russell A. Denman, MBBS a, Haris M. Haqqani, MBBS, PhD a, b, Vincent R. Deen, MBBS a, c,
a Department of Cardiology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia 
b Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia 
c Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia 

Corresponding author at: Dr Vincent Deen, Department of Cardiology, Prince Charles Hospital, 627 Rode Road, Chermside, Qld 4032, AustraliaDepartment of CardiologyPrince Charles Hospital627 Rode RoadChermsideQld4032Australia

Abstract

Introduction

Left-bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a relatively new technique for conduction system pacing. Australian safety and efficacy data is currently lacking. We aim to evaluate the learning curve, medium-term safety, and lead performance in a high-volume Australian setting.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 200 consecutive LBBAP procedures performed by a single operator at two centres between January 2019 and May 2020. Left bundle branch area pacing was performed predominantly via left subclavian access using a 69 cm Medtronic SelectSecure 3830 pacing lead and a preformed non-steerable C315-His sheath. Procedural success was defined as evidence of left septal or left bundle branch area capture as evidenced by a right bundle branch block-like paced morphology. Procedural characteristics, and follow-up (including lead performance) data were collected. Procedural efficiency over time, as well as safety data, were collected.

Results

Median age was 78.26 years (interquartile range [IQR] 71–85), 37% were female. Atrial fibrillation was present in 22%. The left ventricular ejection fraction <50% in 24%, atrioventricular (AV) block was present in 43.5%, left bundle branch block in 22.5% and right bundle branch block in 24.5%. Acute procedural success was 91.5%. Implant threshold was 0.6V @ 0.5 ms, and 0.75V @ 0.5 ms at 11.9 months of follow-up. The QRS was significant reduced (baseline 134 ms vs implant 114 ms, p<0.001) There was a reduction in procedural time and X-ray dose over the course of the study. There were no complications specific to LBBAP.

Conclusion

LBBAP appears to be a safe and effective pacing strategy. The QRS duration was significantly reduced compared to baseline. There appears to be an early learning curve with LBBAP.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Left bundle branch area pacing, Conduction system pacing, Pacing, LBBAP


Esquema


© 2023  Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 32 - N° 8

P. 993-999 - août 2023 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia Storm After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Form of ‘Angry Purkinje Syndrome’
  • Jeremy William, Jack Shembrey, Edward Quine, Mark Perrin, Daryl Ridley, Ramanathan Parameswaran, Peter M. Kistler, Aleksandr Voskoboinik
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Stroke Recurrence in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Without Atrial Fibrillation on Invasive Cardiac Monitoring
  • Eugene S.J. Tan, Jhobeleen de Leon, Elaine Boey, Howe-Keat Chin, Kian-Hui Ho, Shana Aguirre, Ming-Gin Sim, Swee-Chong Seow, Vijay K. Sharma, Pipin Kojodjojo

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.