Suscribirse

Nuance and profound impact: Evaluating the effects of the unmet full coma scale in patients with mild subdural hemorrhage - 12/02/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.038 
Shuo-Chi Chien a, Shih-Ching Kang b, Po-Hsun Tu a, Ching-Chang Chen a, Yu-San Tee b, Chien-Hung Liao b, Chi-Cheng Chuang a, 1, , Chih-Yuan Fu b, 1, ⁎⁎
a Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Medical College &University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan 
b Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Medical College & University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan 

Corresponding author.⁎⁎Corresponding author at: Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, No. 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Kwei Shan Township, Taoyuan, Taiwan.Department of Trauma and Emergency SurgeryChang Gung Memorial HospitalLinkou Medical CenterNo. 5Fu-Hsing StreetKwei Shan TownshipTaoyuanTaiwan

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with subdural hemorrhage (SDH) and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13–15 are typically categorized as having mild traumatic brain injury. We hypothesize that patients without a maximum GCS score – specifically, patients with GCS scores of 13 and 14 – may exhibit poorer neurological outcomes.

Method

Between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020, SDH patients with GCS scores ranging from 13 to 15 were retrospectively studied. We compared outcomes between patients with a maximum GCS score of 15 and those with scores of either 13 or 14. Independent factors associated with neurological deterioration among patients with a GCS score of 15 were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression (MLR) analysis.

Results

During the study period, 470 patients with SDH and GCS scores between 13 and 15 were examined. Compared to patients with a maximum GCS score (N = 375), those in the GCS 13–14 group (N = 95) showed significantly higher rates of neurological deterioration (33.7% vs. 10.4%, p value <0.001) and neurosurgical interventions (26.3% vs. 16.3%, p value <0.024). Moreover, the GCS 13–14 group had a significantly poorer prognosis than patients with a GCS score of 15 [mortality rate: 7.4% vs. 2.4%, p value <0.017; rate of impaired consciousness at discharge: 21.1% vs. 4.0%, p value <0.001; and rate of neurological disability at discharge: 29.5% vs. 6.9%, p value <0.001]. The MLR analysis revealed that SDH thickness (odds ratio = 1.127, p value = 0.006) was an independent risk factor for neurological disability at discharge in patients with a GCS score of 15.

Conclusion

Among SDH patients with mild TBI, those with GCS scores of 13–14 exhibited poorer neurological outcomes than those with a maximum GCS score. The thickness of the SDH is positively associated with neurological disability in SDH patients with a maximum GCS score.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Mild traumatic brain injury, Full coma scale, Subdural hemorrhage, Thickness


Esquema


© 2023  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 77

P. 60-65 - mars 2024 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Involuntary sedation of patients in the emergency department for mental health: A retrospective cohort study
  • Lauren T. Southerland, Cassandra L. Pasadyn, Omar Alnemer, Chase Foy, Sheela Vaswani, Sana Chughtai, Henry W. Young, Katherine B. Brownlowe
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Cash critical care time prices vary substantially by region and hospital ownership: A cross-sectional study
  • Tony Zitek, Jacob S. Alexander, Joseph Bui, Nicole Gonzalez, Eric Scheppke, Samanthalee Obiorah, Christopher Wong, David A. Farcy

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.