Should “primary immune disorder” replace “inborn error of immunity”? Names matter, but there is room for both - 05/06/24
Doi : 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.04.007
Stuart E. Turvey, MBBS, DPhil ⁎ 
, Catherine M. Biggs, MD, MSc, Elliot L. James, MD, Kyla J. Hildebrand, MD, MScCH (HPTE)
, Catherine M. Biggs, MD, MSc, Elliot L. James, MD, Kyla J. Hildebrand, MD, MScCH (HPTE) Division of Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, BC Children’s Hospital, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
∗Corresponding author: Stuart E. Turvey, MBBS, DPhil, FRCPC, BC Children’s Hospital, 950 W 28th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada.BC Children’s Hospital950 W 28th AveVancouverBCV5Z 4H4Canada
Key words : Inborn errors of immunity, primary immune deficiencies, nomenclature
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.
© 2024
Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS.
Vol 153 - N° 6
P. 1546-1547 - juin 2024 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente
- Rethinking PIDs: Why the distinction between primary and secondary immune disorders is more frequently relevant than that between inborn and acquired errors of immunity
- Markus G. Seidel
- Learning from nemolizumab: A promising therapy for prurigo nodularis
- Brian S. Kim
Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.
¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?