Suscribirse

Optimal bowel diameter thresholds for diagnosing small bowel obstruction and surgical intervention with point-of-care ultrasound - 10/09/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.07.019 
Hamid Shokoohi a, , 1 , Nour Al Jalbout a , Gary D. Peksa b , Katherine Dickerson Mayes c , Brent A. Becker d, Keith S. Boniface e, Shadi Lahham f , Michael Secko g , Miromid Chavoshzadeh h, Timothy Jang i , Michael Gottlieb j
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America 
b Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America 
c Harvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America 
d Department of Emergency Medicine, WellSpan York Hospital, York, PA, United States of America 
e Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America 
f Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA, United States of America 
g Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America 
h Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 
i Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor UCLA, CA, United States of America 
j Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America 

Corresponding author at: 125 Nashua Street, Suite 2424, Boston, MA, United States of America125 Nashua Street, Suite 2424BostonMAUnited States of America

Abstract

Objectives

A bowel diameter threshold of ≥2.5 cm, originally derived from the research using computed tomography, is frequently used for diagnosing small bowel obstruction (SBO) with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). We sought to determine the optimal bowel diameter threshold for diagnosing SBO using POCUS and its accuracy in predicting surgical intervention.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis using individual patient-level data from a previous systematic review on POCUS for SBO diagnosis across five academic EDs. Patient data were collected, including imaging results, surgical findings, and final diagnosis. The measured diameter of the small bowel using POCUS was recorded. ROC area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were constructed to determine the optimal threshold for bowel diameter in predicting SBO diagnosis and surgical intervention. Subgroup analyses were performed based on sex and age.

Results

A total of 403 patients had individual patient-level data available, with 367 patients included in the final analysis. The most accurate bowel diameter overall for predicting SBO was 2.75 cm (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI 0.71–0.81). A bowel diameter of ≤1.7 cm had 100% sensitivity with no miss rate, while a bowel diameter of ≥4 cm had 90.7% specificity in confirming SBO. Patients under 65 had an optimal threshold of 2.75 cm versus 2.95 cm in patients over 65. Females had an optimal threshold of 2.75 cm, while males had a value of 2.95 cm. There was no significant correlation between bowel diameter thresholds and surgical intervention.

Conclusion

A bowel diameter threshold of 2.75 cm on POCUS is more discriminative diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing SBO. Patients' age and sex may impact diagnostic accuracy, suggesting that tailored approaches may be needed.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Small bowel obstruction, Point-of-care ultrasound, Bowel diameter, Diagnostic accuracy, Surgical intervention, Emergency department


Esquema


© 2024  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 84

P. 1-6 - octobre 2024 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Info for authors
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Comparative safety and efficacy of a hybrid intravenous and oral diltiazem protocol for acute rate control in the emergency department
  • A. Brad Hall, Kayla Wilson, Steven Guggino, Fred Blind

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.