Suscribirse

Bladder instillations vs onabotulinumtoxinA injection for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: a randomized clinical trial - 22/10/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.027 
Eva K. Welch, MD, MS a, , Katherine L. Dengler, MD b, Angela M. DiCarlo-Meacham, MD c, Joy E. Wheat, MD a, Carissa J. Pekny, MD d, James K. Aden, PhD e, Christine M. Vaccaro, DO b
a Department of Gynecologic Surgery & Obstetrics–Urogynecology Division, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX 
b Department of Gynecologic Surgery & Obstetrics–Urogynecology Division, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 
c Department of Gynecologic Surgery & Obstetrics–Urogynecology Division, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA 
d Department of Gynecologic Surgery & Obstetrics, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 
e Graduate Medical Education, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX 

Corresponding author: Eva K. Welch, MD, MS, FACOG.

Abstract

Background

Interstitial cystitis (IC)/bladder pain syndrome (BPS) is an unpleasant sensation related to the bladder with lower urinary tract symptoms lasting more than 6 weeks, unrelated to an otherwise identifiable cause. The etiology is likely multifactorial including urothelial abnormalities, neurogenic pain upregulation, and potentially bladder and vaginal microbiome alterations. Despite treatment effectiveness of both bladder instillations and intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection for this condition, a head-to-head comparison has not been performed.

Objective

To compare the efficacy of bladder instillations and intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection for treatment of IC/BPS.

Study design

Patients with O'Leary-Sant (OLS) questionnaire scores of ≥6, meeting clinical criteria for IC/BPS, and desiring procedural management were randomized to bladder instillations or intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection. The primary outcome was the difference in OLS scores at 2 months posttreatment between groups. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of sexual function, physical/mental health status, pain, patient satisfaction, treatment perception, retreatment, and adverse event rates.

Results

Forty-seven patients were analyzed with 22 randomized to bladder instillations and 25 to onabotulinumtoxinA injection. There were no differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between groups. From baseline to 2 months posttreatment, there was a decrease in OLS subscales in all patients (Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index [ICSI] −6.3 (confidence interval [CI] −8.54, −3.95), P<.0001; Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index [ICPI] −5.9 (CI −8.18, −3.57), P<.0001). At 2 months posttreatment, patients in the onabotulinumtoxinA group had significantly lower OLS scores compared to those in the bladder instillation group (ICSI 6.3±4.5 [onabotulinumtoxinA] vs 9.6±4.2 [instillation], P=.008; ICPI 5.9±5.1 [onabotulinumtoxinA] vs 8.3±4.0 [instillation], P=.048). The difference in OLS scores between groups did not persist at 6 to 9 months posttreatment. There were no statistically significant differences between baseline and posttreatment time points for the remaining questionnaires. Eight percent of patients who received onabotulinumtoxinA injection experienced urinary retention requiring self-catheterization. Patients who underwent onabotulinumtoxinA injection were significantly less likely to receive retreatment within 6 to 9 months compared to patients who received bladder instillations (relative risk 13.6; 95% CI, 1.92–96.6; P=.0002). There were no differences between groups regarding patient satisfaction, perception of treatment convenience, or willingness to undergo retreatment.

Conclusion

Both onabotulinumtoxinA injection and bladder instillations are safe, effective treatments for patients with IC/BPS, with significant clinical improvement demonstrated at 2 months posttreatment. Our findings suggest that intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection is a more effective procedural treatment for this condition than bladder instillation therapy and associated with decreased rates of retreatment.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Key words : bladder instillation therapy, bladder pain syndrome, cystoscopy, interstitial cystitis, intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection, painful bladder syndrome, randomized controlled trial, clinical trial


Esquema


 Clinical trial registration
 i) Registration date: May 26, 2020.
 ii) Date of initial participant enrollment: September 16, 2020.
 iii) Clinical trial # NCT04401176.
 iv) NCT04401176
 v) Data sharing information
 a. Will individual participant data be available (including data dictionaries)? Yes.
 b. What data in particular will be shared? Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (texts, tables, figures).
 c. What other documents will be available? Study protocol.
 d. When will data be available? Immediately following publication. No end date.
 e. How will data be shared (including with whom, for what types of analyses, and by what mechanism)? Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal, to achieve aims in the approved proposal. Proposals should be directed to eva.k.welch.mil@health.mil. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 This research was presented as an oral presentation at the 49th annual scientific meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, Tucson, AZ, Mar. 19–22, 2023.
 The opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do not represent the Department of Health and Human Services or the Department of Defense.
 Cite this article as: Welch EK, Dengler KL, DiCarlo-Meacham AM, et al. Bladder instillations vs onabotulinumtoxinA injection for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024;231:528.e1-11.


© 2024  Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 231 - N° 5

P. 528.e1-528.e11 - novembre 2024 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Uterine cancer incidence trends and 5-year relative survival by race/ethnicity and histology among women under 50 years
  • Akemi T. Wijayabahu, Meredith S. Shiels, Rebecca C. Arend, Megan A. Clarke
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Placement of an intrauterine device within 48 hours after second-trimester medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial
  • Sara Hogmark, Johanna Rydelius, Niklas Envall, Pia Teleman, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Helena Kopp Kallner

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.