Suscribirse

Refractive Error in Inherited Retinal Disease - 09/12/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.09.011 
Shaden H. Yassin a, Naomi E. Wagner a, Thomas Khuu b, Ryan Schmidt b, Austin D. Igelman b, Molly Marra b, Hilary Schwartz d, e, Evan Walker a, Aaron Nagiel d, e, Paul Yang b, Lesley A. Everett b, Mark E. Pennesi b, c, d, Shyamanga Borooah a, ⁎
a From the Shiley Eye Institute (S.H.Y., N.E.W., E.W., S.B.), University of California, La Jolla, California 
b Casey Eye Institute (T.K., R.S., A.D.I., M.M., P.Y., L.A.E., M.E.P.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 
c Retina Foundation (M.E.P.), Dallas, Texas 
d The Vision Center (H.S., A.N.), Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 
e Roski Eye Institute (H.S., A.N.), Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA 

⁎Inquiries to Shyamanga Borooah, Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, 9415 Campus Point Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.Department of OphthalmologyShiley Eye InstituteUniversity of California San Diego9415 Campus Point DrLa JollaCA 92093USA

Resumen

Purpose

Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) lead to significant vision impairment. Refractive errors (REs) are also associated with vision impairment and an increased risk of ocular comorbidities and may compound impairment caused by IRDs. Identifying the pattern of RE in IRDs may assist in better management of patients with IRD and provide insights into understanding genetic associations with RE. The aim of this study was to investigate the patterns of RE in patients with IRD from three academic ophthalmology referral centers.

Design

Retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Methods

Chart review of clinically and molecularly confirmed IRD cases seen at the University of California San Diego, Oregon Health and Science University, and Children's Hospital Los Angeles. Data retrieved included patient demographics, disease phenotype, genotype, best-corrected visual acuity, objective, and/or subjective refraction.

Results

A total of 1942 patients' notes were reviewed. Of these, 634 patients (1255 eyes) had refractive data. For genes associated with myopia, NYX (n = 14 [1%]) was associated with the highest spherical equivalent RE of myopia (mean -9.26 diopters [D] [95% CI -11.867 to -6.651], P < .001) followed by IMPG2 (n = 16 [1.1%]) (mean -4.062 D [95% CI -6.254 to -1.871], P = .002), then RPGR (n = 104 [7.2%]) (mean -2.664 D [95% CI -3.618 to -1.710], P = .016) and for genes associated with hyperopia, BEST1 (n = 38 [2.6%]) had the highest spherical equivalent RE for hyperopia (mean 2.996 D [95% CI 1.830-4.162], P < .001) followed by RS1 (n = 26 [1.8%]) (mean 2.562 D [95% CI 1.454-3.671], P < .001), then CNGA3 (n = 28 [1.9%]) (mean 0.603 D [95% CI -0.48 to 1.686], P = .009). Overall, patients with IRD were significantly more myopic than age-matched control participants.

Conclusion

By combining genetic testing with refraction data from a large cohort of patients, we identify IRD genes associated with myopia and hyperopia. However, we find that the pattern of ametropia varies widely not only by gene but also within a gene cohort. The genes identified to be associated with RE are candidates for further in-depth investigation to understand their functional role in RE.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


 Supplemental Material available at AJO.com.
 Presented as a poster at the Shiley Eye Institute Residents and Fellows Research Forum 2023, San Diego, California, the Annual Meeting of The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023, New Orleans, Louisiana, and the Annual Meeting of The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022, Denver, Colorado.


© 2024  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 269

P. 381-392 - janvier 2025 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • A New Era of Ophthalmology Leadership? A Descriptive and Comparative Analysis of Ophthalmology Department Chairs in 2024
  • Samuel A. Cohen, Victoria L. Tseng, Jayanth Sridhar, Anne L. Coleman
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Outcomes of Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment for Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Single Center Experience
  • BOYOUNG M. KIM, KENNY Y. WANG, TIMOTHY T. XU, SARA J. HOOSHMAND, GARY N. TOUPS, MARTHA P. MILLMAN, LAWRENCE W. STEINKRAUS, ANDREA A. TOOLEY, ANDREW J. BARKMEIER, JOHN J. CHEN

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.