Suscribirse

Combined Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery With Phacoemulsification in Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis - 13/01/25

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.07.034 
Po Hsiang (Shawn) Yuan a, b, , Marisa Dorling c, Manjool Shah d, Joseph F. Panarelli d, Georges M. Durr a, e
a From the Department of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec (P.H.S.Y., G.M.D.) 
b Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine (P.H.S.Y.) 
c Faculty of Medicine (M.D.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 
d Department of Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA (M.S., J.F.P.) 
e Department of Ophthalmology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (G.M.D.) 

Inquiries to Po Hsiang (Shawn) Yuan, Ophthalmology Resident, University of British Colombia, Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaOphthalmology ResidentUniversity of British ColombiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada

Resumen

Purpose

To compare efficacies and safeties of combined phacoemulsification–microinvasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) to phacoemulsification only in eyes with open-angle glaucoma.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A multidatabase literature search was conducted to capture MIGS articles published before April 19, 2024. Key exclusion criteria were inadequate follow-up, significant loss to follow-up, standalone MIGS surgery, or unreported primary outcomes. MIGS were grouped according to mechanisms of action: (1) trabecular meshwork (TM) bypass that improves aqueous drainage into Schlemm's canal, (2) non–gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (non-GATT) goniotomies that remove TM with varying devices, and (3) GATT that removes TM with a catheter or suture placed into Schlemm's canal. Efficacy was measured by reductions in intraocular pressure (IOP) and medications, whereas safety was compared using incidence of sight-threatening and other adverse events.

Results

A total of 95 studies were included, accounting for 9733 eyes followed up at 1-year. The control group had a baseline IOP of 16.9 (95% CI: 15.9-17.9) mm Hg on 1.43 (1.19-1.68) medications and a postoperative IOP of 15.2 (14.4-15.9) mm Hg on 0.80 (0.54-1.00) medications. The TM bypass baseline IOP was 18.2 (17.6-18.7) mm Hg on 1.89 (1.78-2.01) medications that lowered to an IOP of 14.8 (14.5-15.1) mm Hg on 0.80 (0.65-0.95) medications at 1 year after operation. The non-GATT goniotomy baseline IOP was 20.0 (19.2-20.8) mm Hg on 2.30 (2.09-2.53) medications, and at 1-year follow-up, the IOP was 14.6 (14.3-15.0) mm Hg on 1.41 (1.22-1.62) medications. Lastly, the GATT baseline IOP of 21.8 (19.5-24.1) mm Hg on 2.90 (2.36-3.44) medications was reduced to an IOP of 12.5 (10.0-15.0) mm Hg on 0.73 (0.37-1.09) medications at 1-year after operation. All MIGS groups had equal or lower rates of sight-threatening events and secondary glaucoma surgery when compared with control. GATT had the highest hyphema rate at 27.7% (13.5%-44.5%) followed by non-GATT goniotomy with 15.5% (7.8%-25.0%). These were both significantly higher than TM bypass and control groups, with hyphema rates of 3.5% (1.6%-5.9%) and 4% (only 1 study reporting hyphema rate), respectively.

Conclusions

Based on current peer-reviewed articles, there is strong evidence that when compared with phacoemulsification alone, combined phacoemulsification-MIGS is beneficial for patients with open-angle glaucoma and does not increase the incidence of vision-threatening events. Key limitations of our review stem from heterogeneities in protocol design or outcome reporting and a limited number of high-quality studies with long-term follow-up.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


 Supplemental Material available at AJO.com.


© 2024  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 270

P. 154-163 - février 2025 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthetics in Peribulbar Block: A Meta-analysis With Trial-Sequential Analysis
  • Eduardo Maia Martins Pereira, Patrícia Viana, Rodrigo Araujo Monteiro da Silva, Pedro Furlan Silott, Sara Amaral
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Myopic Maculopathy Progression: Insights Into Posterior Staphyloma and Macular Involvement
  • Ignacio Flores-Moreno, Mariluz Puertas, Marina Fernández-Jiménez, Luis Celestino Franco, María Terrón-Vilalta, Blanca Eslava, Elena Almazán-Alonso, Jorge Ruiz-Medrano, Bachar Kudsieh, María García-Zamora, José M. Ruiz-Moreno

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.