Suscribirse

Provincial PPE Safety Coach Program evaluation in continuing care settings in Alberta - 13/08/25

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajic.2025.06.002 
Kaethel Decker, BHSc a, , Heather Gagnon, MPH a, Abram Gutscher, BHSC, MHA e, Meaghan Brierley, PhD d, f, Sara Mallinson, PhD b, d, f, Jenine Leal, PhD a, b, c, d
a Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 
b Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 
c Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 
d O’Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 
e Seniors Health and Continuing Care, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 
f Health Systems Evaluation and Evidence, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 

Address correspondence to Kaethel Decker, BHSc, 225 Mt Blakiston Rd West, Lethbridge, AB T1K6M3, Canada.225 Mt Blakiston Rd WestLethbridgeABT1K6M3Canada

Resumen

Background

Alberta Health Services (AHS) offered the Provincial Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Safety Coach Program to continuing care homes to provide support to staff regarding the safe and appropriate use of PPE.

Methods

A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate staff experiences of training, adoption, and perceived impact of the program. Data were gathered using an online survey and semistructured qualitative interviews. The evaluation drew on implementation science frameworks to review implementation processes and contextual factors influencing program uptake and participant experiences.

Results

A total of 283 surveys and 22 qualitative interviews were completed. Key findings are grouped into the following categories: program uptake, program content and delivery, skills and knowledge, the program’s perceived impact, and feedback from nonadopting sites.

Conclusions

Trained staff were largely satisfied with the delivery and content of the modules and other staff indicated it was beneficial to have support from trained staff. Sites that did not adopt the program indicated that the timing of the launch, ongoing staffing challenges, and the use of alternative PPE training were barriers to uptake.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Adopting sites were positive about content, delivery, and effectiveness.
Advantages were program content, mode of delivery, and providing extra support.
Untrained staff indicated it was beneficial to have support from trained staff.
Funding was not a sufficient to overcome the barriers for nonadopting sites.
Barriers for nonadopting sites were timing, staffing levels and alternative programs.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Key Words : Personal protective equipment (PPE), Coaching, Infection prevention and control


Esquema


 Conflicts of interest: None to report.
 Funding/support: Funding was received from Healthcare Excellence Canada.


© 2025  Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 53 - N° 9

P. 967-976 - septembre 2025 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Preventing microbial contamination during radiological imaging: Experimental evaluation of a multiuse contrast media infusion system incorporating sequential one-way valves within a dual-safety design
  • Matheus (Roland) van Rens, Kevin Hugill, L. Natalia Galvan, Benjamin Tanner
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Outbreak of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in a Southern California hospital
  • Jacob M. Garrigues, Hannah K. Gray, Ricardo P. Ison, Daniel Z. Uslan, Amorce Lima, Shekina Gonzalez-Ferrer, Marisol Trejo, Ran Zhuo, Colette J. Matysiak Match, Erlinda R. Ulloa, Sandeep Bhaurla, Vanessa Lewis, Urvashi Parti, Tessa Sandoval, Sebora Turay, Shaunté Walton, Kavitha Prabaker, Omai B. Garner, Sukantha Chandrasekaran, Nicole M. Green, Shangxin Yang

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.